- Messages
- 347
- Reactions
- 88
I say anything that empowers individuals - especially knowledge - is all good
That has been in steady decline for the last 4 decades. Something else that isn't the governments fault.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I say anything that empowers individuals - especially knowledge - is all good
Yep, possibly the world's worst public education system is not the government's fault and a total failure.
But government is getting what it wants. Unthinking, never questioning drones. So I guess that is the positive side. Always nice to get what you pay for ...
The government distorted nothing. You had a bunch of idiots who over borrowed money they had no chance of paying back, run out and buy anything and everything they could get their hands on.
Yep, possibly the world's worst public education system is not the government's fault and a total failure.
But government is getting what it wants. Unthinking, never questioning drones. So I guess that is the positive side. Always nice to get what you pay for ...
I think the topic was 'felons and firearms' and posed the question of reinstatement of a convicted felon possessing firearms after they have been discharged from supervision, correct?
To that I would say that it falls under the 'regulated' part of 2A (the drafters built-in "interference" clause if you like) and that one convicted of a felony has demonstrated a sufficient lack of sound judgement such that this form of 'regulation' is not only appropriate, but...to the victim of violent crime, after having received the notification from the Oregon VINE system, that the person convicted of trying to kill them has been released, it is welcomed.
Implying the presence of cheap credit created by the federal reserve did not distort the real estate market by increasing demand of homes, hence increasing the price.
Likewise, the same argument for the cheap credit boom of the 20's, with the same culprit in the federal reserve.
Total, utter economics 101 fail, and predictably coming from a guy who claims FOPA86 did not distort the machine gun market.
Implying the presence of cheap credit created by the federal reserve did not distort the real estate market by increasing demand of homes, hence increasing the price. Likewise, the same argument for the cheap credit boom of the 20's, with the same culprit in the federal reserve.
The troll is indeed quite incompetent and needs more edumacation
Not even close no mind. It wasn't "cheap credit" that caused this. Mortgage rates are far cheaper today than they were at the peak of the housing boom.
BLAH BLAH BLAH A BUNCH OF HOT AIR AND INCORRECT CRAP
Cheap credit is a low interest rate.
100% interest for 5 years isn't cheap. LEARN TO READ. Cheap money did not create the housing crash as you claim. Idiots did. Wake up!
It's cheap for the banks! That's the issue at hand
Banks don't buy houses people do. If they are willing to pay 100% interest on a loan, what difference does it make how cheap it is or isn't for the banks? Since when are idiots borrowing money concerned how much the banks are making? Please, stop proving your total ignorance.
You are flat out wrong claiming loans were actually more expensive during the 2000's bubble period. 30 year interest rates in the mid 2000's were lower than they had ever been in the past 20 year period. Therefore, the cost of loans in the 2000's were lower than they had ever been at the time.
Your continued insistence that the biggest player in the market (the government via freddie/fannie and the federal reserve) can have no effect on said market is blatantly absurd.