- Messages
- 353
- Reactions
- 556
Physical confrontation between a couple of meth head instigators, and some Beach that worships at the church of Kate Brown
The action happens from 3:35-5:45
I gotta admit I'm a little torn on this one, 1st off the 2 tweekers definitely went in there looking to provoke a conflict.
But then on the other hand the store owner made plenty of mistakes as well, she honestly initiated the first physical contact, when she tried chest bumping the female tweeker.
The female tweeker at that point had the right to create space with physical force in retaliation (when she shoved her, she was within her rights to lush that beach)
The owner then pulls a bat and threatens physical violence, and states that "i can use physical force to enforcement trespass" this is not correct, you CAN use physical force to prevent destruction of personal property, or harm to yourself or others, physical force cannot be used by private citizens to enforce mask mandates or even trespass laws.
She then shoved the female tweeker with the bat, which then escalates this from menacing with a weapon to assault (on the shop owner)
The tweekers talking about they can't be refused service, that's incorrect, a private business CAN tell you to leave and don't have to provide a reason of you refuse to leave, and are not an immediate threat to health and safety of employees or property, the business owners only recourse is to call the police, have you removed and have a trespass letter put on file against you.
I'm still just 23 minutes into the video and no ones been arrested yet, but according to the kezi story the tweekers do get arrested.
Any thoughts on this one?
Eugene store owner attacked while enforcing mask mandate, police say
EUGENE, Ore. -- The owner of a Eugene cookie store was assaulted while trying to enforce the mask mandate on Wednesday, police say.
www.kezi.com
The action happens from 3:35-5:45
I gotta admit I'm a little torn on this one, 1st off the 2 tweekers definitely went in there looking to provoke a conflict.
But then on the other hand the store owner made plenty of mistakes as well, she honestly initiated the first physical contact, when she tried chest bumping the female tweeker.
The female tweeker at that point had the right to create space with physical force in retaliation (when she shoved her, she was within her rights to lush that beach)
The owner then pulls a bat and threatens physical violence, and states that "i can use physical force to enforcement trespass" this is not correct, you CAN use physical force to prevent destruction of personal property, or harm to yourself or others, physical force cannot be used by private citizens to enforce mask mandates or even trespass laws.
She then shoved the female tweeker with the bat, which then escalates this from menacing with a weapon to assault (on the shop owner)
The tweekers talking about they can't be refused service, that's incorrect, a private business CAN tell you to leave and don't have to provide a reason of you refuse to leave, and are not an immediate threat to health and safety of employees or property, the business owners only recourse is to call the police, have you removed and have a trespass letter put on file against you.
I'm still just 23 minutes into the video and no ones been arrested yet, but according to the kezi story the tweekers do get arrested.
Any thoughts on this one?