Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 4,923
- Reactions
- 11,988
Heavens forbid someone used a gun from pre microstamping.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only says that the firearm was there......nothing......about "WHO pulled the trigger" of the said firearm.
What you say is so true. I followed up on hundreds of hit and run cases in CA. We could find the car, but you cannot put a car in jail. The poor victims would say the owner must have been driving...check for fingerprints or DNA..., but there is a 0% chance a Deputy DA will even look at the case without a witness to ID the suspect...just like in firearms cases. My gun, just like my car, will have my prints and DNA.It doesn't even say if the firearm was there. As noted above, swap firing pins or sandpaper it, go to the range and get brass stamped by other guns, do your driveby with a 9mm revolver and throw the random stamped 9s out the window. None of those guns were there.
BINGO! That's the California way Make up some research and pass a law.AWSHo
There is no further reference to the CHP and LAPD tests.
There is a reference to "...tests have shown....", but there is no specific reference to the actual tests. This legislature also voted down law enforcement use of facial recognition programs based on tests they conducted. They used photos of 26 legislators and ran them through a specific program. All the facial recognition program identified all as wanted persons and provided a photo and info. I saw both in the newspaper article and even I could tell there were no actual matches.
A number of persons and organizations asked to see the actual tests, settings etc. No release of info. The manufacturer of the program itself asked for that info.
With his program, the user has the ability to set the parameters for searching for a match. Legis still would not release the actual test.
Micro-stamping is not for the visually impaired or is older folks...