Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 5,132
- Reactions
- 9,158
It's about stopping the threat against you or a loved one. Lethality is irrelevant. That's also my justification for using SD ammunition. Energy dissipation into the threat is the goal, not causing wounds.This is what I think about: Let's say you have a knife and a gun on you. With it being noted that both can be equally lethal, would the law expect you to use the weapon that is perceived to be least lethal first? (As if you have all the time in the world for decision-making). What if I feel my life is threatened and I have mace and a gun? This is Oregon after all.