I've heard from a law enforcement officer that bumpstocks are still in litigation due to an ongoing lawsuit. He stated that they are technically not ok to have but still could be ruled ok. I'm glad I didn't get one of those or a frt type trigger as I don't want to risk anything.
I didn't want to say bump stock but definitely one good example. The main reason I didn't get one of those or a trigger or even a full auto is ammo. I was lucky enough to shoot some in my past but can't afford or justify it. But I would never rain on others 2A parade. You want a $10k whatever, knock yourself out.
Where is the proof?
Proof of?
Wow! Scary stuff. He makes some very good points Imo.
Any of what he's saying
but they both summerize the case and it's points. Big Daddy is rolling over for the ATF machine becuse they them selves are done both financially and legally. Making a machine gun with out a license.......OK. The I.T.A.R. issue is much larger on a federal level. I.T.A.R. rules are in place for national security reasons. Breaking national security is far more serious that manufactureing a machine gun.
www.dropbox.com
That means Gunbroker is rolling over like Big Daddy did and coughing up all the info the ATF wants.
The term he used, "Scavenger hunt" is the perfect term imo.
From what I gather, the ATF is posing as buyers on those sights and then nailing the seller(s) who are most likely selling them to avoided trouble with the ATF in the first place and getting some of their money back, it selling for a profit to take advantage of the situation, only to get nailed for it!
