Member 5605
- Messages
- 11,671
- Reactions
- 23,702
This is highly unlikey for reasons I wont' discuss in depth on this forum.Earl Grey party due soon
Simply put; too many who are too comfortable to check the balance.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is highly unlikey for reasons I wont' discuss in depth on this forum.Earl Grey party due soon
Not sure what your point is. You may be a tough guy that has no responsibility to anyone but yourself, but not many of us are in that situation. Taking the chance of being imprisoned and unable to provide for our families is more important than being movie character patriots. You can go ahead and spout off about those of us following the law being creampuff turncoats but you're only turning up the volume in your own echo chamber. Please take your trolling somewhere else, we don't need it or tolerate it here.News flash, if you're currently a CHL holder, you've already agreed to the 9th Circuit's ruling. It doesn't matter if it's shall issue or not, a CHL is a state level restriction on your right to carry.
Only people in constitutional carry states without a CHL are truly unrestricted.
You see folks, when the founders wrote, "..., the right to keep and BEAR arms shall not be infringed," they were codifying the right to carry a gun from your bedroom to the kitchen.
Do you really think they would have meant for people...like the militia...to carry guns outside the home? PuhLease! That's absurd! Because guns are dangerous Yo!
*sarcasm*
This is far from over. They can either request a full court en banc...which seems unlikely to me given that it's the 9th and they'll just uphold this decision...as ridiculous as it is...or appeal to SCOTUS. And who the hell really knows what SCOTUS will do it.
Indeed. It's going to have to get much worse before any significant number of people get off their butts and get into action... probably oh long after Biden/Harris perhaps when China claims much of the United States as its slave colony... simply due to the massive debt it owns..perhaps after the economy finally crashes and die.This is highly unlikey for reasons I wont' discuss in depth on this forum.
Simply put; too many who are too comfortable to check the balance.
You should all read the opinion and dissents. Comentary is helpful but not always right.
I wish I have your optimism regarding SCOTUSAt any rate the dissent will win in the supreme court IMO. The practical blanket ban is too much.
Conventional that they left out Idaho although I do recall Arizona having a Constitutional Carry thing?
Well. It opens up a SCOTUS potential case because.. Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, Montana.. these 4 States have a form of permitless/Constitutional Carry laws.
he did not challenge that he could not get a CHL, but sent to the court that he could not OC, the court said that he did not go through the prosses of getting or finding out why he cold not get a CHL FIRST ergo the court filing was premature in regards to him getting a CHL of finding out why he could not. the decent comments from the 9th are very telling if the case was measured on the right to carry period, but HW gives the person the ability to get a CHL instead of a permit to OC.Can you give us the Cliff Notes version for the legally challenged? 215 pages is a bit much for some of us.
The article I read said it WAS an en banc decision, 11-4.
but HW gives the person the ability to get a CHL instead of a permit to OC.
That act of BS should be worth another lawsuit ASAP!It's telling that Hawaii gives the ability to get a CHL, but then as soon as this court case was decided en-mass denied all applications that were pending. So a de facto ban.
Don't worry states like oregon are refusing to prosecute criminals or dropping charges, dismantling measure 11 and making it retro active, releasing prisoners, welcoming illegals, allowing rampant homelessness and mental illness, and celebrating rioting, theft, and trying to harm/kill police officers, defunding the police, decriminalizing drugs, while deliberately tanking the economy.
I mean in this liberal (socialist) utopia we shouldn't need guns