Northwest 9th circus does it again - Rules states may restrict people from openly carrying guns in public

[clearconscience]

Don't worry states like oregon are refusing to prosecute criminals or dropping charges, dismantling measure 11 and making it retro active, releasing prisoners, welcoming illegals, allowing rampant homelessness and mental illness, and celebrating rioting, theft, and trying to harm/kill police officers, defunding the police, decriminalizing drugs, while deliberately tanking the economy.

I mean in this liberal (socialist) utopia we shouldn't need guns

 

[Member 53328]

im gonna do what i wanna do. idgaf especially if someone tells me i have no right to defend myself or my family with the best means possible.

.gov can kick rocks.

The government can Kick rocks and pound sand. I'm with you! They need us. We don't need them. Eventually they will be reminded of that. You can only push so far. Action has reaction.

 

[jrd541280]

if you read the descents and the reasons it would not be that hard of a fight, it was mostly a procedural issue that was the argument

yeah, that's how they do it.
30 dollar tabs voted how many times?
rossi not gov how many times?
state tax on income against the wa constitution how many times?
hell, that snake even taxes me on food for my dog.
procedures only protect the procedure writers and you are not welcome to have input on their content.

 

[ryo2021]

I love Oregon

 

[jrd541280]

My elected officials just ignore me and do as they please...

Geez, you'd think I'm married to them or something...

they'll let you know.

 

[Flymph]

I love Oregon

Me too, but I don't like the valley's politics.

 

[v0lcom13sn0w]

#not my politics

 

[v0lcom13sn0w]

Don't worry states like oregon are refusing to prosecute criminals or dropping charges, dismantling measure 11 and making it retro active, releasing prisoners, welcoming illegals, allowing rampant homelessness and mental illness, and celebrating rioting, theft, and trying to harm/kill police officers, defunding the police, decriminalizing drugs, while deliberately tanking the economy.

I mean in this liberal (socialist) utopia we shouldn't need guns

just think if it was a bunch of gun owners protesting in portland in the manner that these lunatics have been protesting...i mean RIOTING, destroying the city....we'd get carpet bombed.

 

[Member 52301]

My elected officials just ignore me and do as they please...

Geez, you'd think I'm married to them or something...

Oh my goodness! Good one!

I NEED this post framed and hung up on the wall!

I get answers from most of them but they don't give a rat's butt or FIX a boat load of issues/problems.

The ONLY thing that they fix is make my TAXES GO UP and spend money like a bunch of IDIOTS.

FISCAL conservative with a Libertarian slant means ZERO to ALL of them!

Cate

 

[Member 52301]

Amid gun control debate, federal court rules states may restrict open carry of weapons

9th Circuit Court of Appeals upholds a Hawaii regulation, ruling states may restrict the open carrying of guns

www.latimes.com

Saw it originally while scrolling from this:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1374807108533825544

Cannot find many other sources currently beyond LAtimes. I am sure shortly more will report.

More reporting:
States may restrict people from openly carrying guns in public, U.S. appeals court rules | KTLA

Hello,

My husband told me about this news story when he got home from our range on Wednesday afternoon.

At first, he could not find TONS of information on it and when I finally DECIDED to read the GARBAGE - I did an internet search and MORE and more LINKS with news including one on a military websites told MORE about this story. Most likely this will be on more news websites including on MORE military websites.

I am too sore to type more now.

I hope that the news SPREADS ALL OVER too.

There will be a gun show in Kalispell, MT this weekend. I am dying to HEAR what people say from a few people that I know who will be there.

9th circuit court right to carry - Google Search

US Appeals court rules Americans don't have right to open carry guns in public | American Military News

This ruling impacts RTC laws in AK, HI, CA, AZ, OR, WA, & MT. = QUOTE. Wrong news with NOT all of the states on here?!

Isn't IDAHO in the 9th? I thought that it was. NV?

HOW accurate is this list now?!

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Wikipedia

I DO NOT LIKE WIKI but here you go!

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (in case citations, 9th Cir.) is a federal court of appeals that has appellate jurisdiction over the district courts in the following districts:

• District of Alaska
• District of Arizona
• Central District of California
• Eastern District of California
• Northern District of California
• Southern District of California
• District of Hawaii
• District of Idaho
• District of Montana
• District of Nevada
• District of Oregon
• Eastern District of Washington
• Western District of Washington

It also has appellate jurisdiction over the following territorial courts:

• District of Guam
• District of the Northern Mariana Islands

Additionally, it sometimes handles appeals - MORE ON THE LINK.

Bearing Arms – Saving Liberty and Lives

ALL of them in power want to get RID of open and conceal carry NO matter what they TELL you while they continue to stab you in the back when it comes to the RKBA issue.

THEY have their special taxpayer PAID protection and from private security people in some cases too. PLUS throw in all of their extra guards, including the NG in some places - D.C. and FENCES all over the country just to protect them too.

Old Lady Cate

 

[L84Cabo]

You see folks, when the founders wrote, "..., the right to keep and BEAR arms shall not be infringed," they were codifying the right to carry a gun from your bedroom to the kitchen.

Do you really think they would have meant for people...like the militia...to carry guns outside the home? PuhLease! That's absurd! Because guns are dangerous Yo!

*sarcasm*

This is far from over. They can either request a full court en banc...which seems unlikely to me given that it's the 9th and they'll just uphold this decision...as ridiculous as it is...or appeal to SCOTUS. And who the hell really knows what SCOTUS will do it.

 

[MichaelH]

You should all read the opinion and dissents. Comentary is helpful but not always right.

https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2021/03/24/12-17808.pdf

 

[Paolung]

This is perfect though actually, bump it up to SCOTUS.

IF they touch it. They've been hiding from 2A for several years running now.

 

[PiratePast40]

if you read the descents and the reasons it would not be that hard of a fight, it was mostly a procedural issue that was the argument

Can you give us the Cliff Notes version for the legally challenged? 215 pages is a bit much for some of us.

 

[American123]

I've observed that not following the law is really popular with the left, might be worth trying.

 

[Lennie]

And on the same day of the court ruling, it was announced that the AG of Hawaii who obtained the 9th court ruling denied all applications for carry by private citizens:

The ruling comes on the same day the Hawaii attorney general's office issued a report showing that all private citizens who applied for licenses to carry a gun in public in 2020 were denied.

 

[Dinglenutz]

The actions of SCOTUS recently.. leads me to believe they may not have every American or Constitution's interests at heart

If you're referring to the election law scandal, I'd like to think that was an exceptional case. We will see shortly.

 

[Knarf]

You see folks, when the founders wrote, "..., the right to keep and BEAR arms shall not be infringed," they were codifying the right to carry a gun from your bedroom to the kitchen.

Do you really think they would have meant for people...like the militia...to carry guns outside the home? PuhLease! That's absurd! Because guns are dangerous Yo!

*sarcasm*

This is far from over. They can either request a full court en banc...which seems unlikely to me given that it's the 9th and they'll just uphold this decision...as ridiculous as it is...or appeal to SCOTUS. And who the hell really knows what SCOTUS will do it.

The article I read said it WAS an en banc decision, 11-4.

 

[MichaelH]

If you're referring to the election law scandal, I'd like to think that was an exceptional case. We will see shortly.

Or it was the obvious correct result, despite personal political preference.
I suspect the 2A community is going to get another Heller soon.

 

[Dinglenutz]

Or it was the obvious correct result

I think most people's gripe is that we'll probably never know, since they sidestepped it, but this isn't the place for that discussion.