- Messages
- 11,840
- Reactions
- 11,103
So, My thoughts are.... If it were an inside job, why bother with all the effort to make them fall straight down. If maximum effect were to be plotted then I think it would have been to have the falling buildings fall into even more buildings causing a domino effect or at least maximize damage by involving other buildings or falling lengthwise onto a street. Can you imagine 10 or 20,000 casualties.
Actually it is just the reverse.
Inside job wouldn't want to destroy too much more than the "white elephant" target. Then you keep some commerce going.
That's why there wasn't very many killed
The terrorist approach would have been to destroy and kill as much as possible to destroy the commerce and cripple the city
Isn't that what was said? They wanted to cripple the US economy?
Why wouldn't they have crashed them into the base of the buildings?
They would have loved to have killed 10-20k infidels,christians,Americans,non muslims
Not saying who did it,just that it was obviously a demo job.
Impossible for a swaying building that tall to fall like it did without help.
This is kinda like who killed JFK,there were plenty who would make money and get help for their cause with this event.