Member 53328
- Messages
- 9,059
- Reactions
- 19,929
They do.Hope they run Glocks……
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They do.Hope they run Glocks……
I thought Glock 10 rounders were converted standard capacity mags which can be converted back to standard capacity? If so, those regular Glock 10 round mags are also illegal.Hope they run Glocks……
Oh I dunno. I thought that WA gun law guy said they were easily converted back to regular capacity. Have never even seen a Glock 10 round mag myself so only going on what he said.It's been many years since I played with a 10rd Glock mag, but I believe they have internal ribs that run the length of the mag, thus preventing more than 10rds. I have never heard of anyone trying to modify them to hold over 10rds.
If you were stuck buying 10rd mags, then Glock has got to be the cheapest around and Glock has the capacity to supply them to folks in ban states that need them.
Washington gun lawyer on youtube, guy gets alot of things wrong. Wouldn't trust him at all. You should see the moronic things he says about pistol braces.Oh I dunno. I thought that WA gun law guy said they were easily converted back to regular capacity. Have never even seen a Glock 10 round mag myself so only going on what he said.
87? Not 86 or 88?Should write 87 letters to the AFT for clarification.
What size of coal do big ships burn?87? Not 86 or 88?
Don't they run on liquid dinosaur?What size of coal do big ships burn?
The size of their tank - bunker fuel !What size of coal do big ships burn?
It is truly amazing how many people didn't read the bill before voting on it, or just didn't vote at all. Amazing.View attachment 1319014
That you own a security company and you didn't know the answer before the election was held.
Aloha, Mark
I tried but couldn't find the answers. I checked with DPSST and they had no response. So…..?View attachment 1319014
That you own a security company and you didn't know the answer before the election was held.
Aloha, Mark
I've been amazed at the number of gun owners saying they approved of 114 because they think there should be more training.It is truly amazing how many people didn't read the bill before voting on it, or just didn't vote at all. Amazing.
Which is why Oregon has a Single Topic per Ballot Measure requirement which the anti-gun Oregon SoS Shema Flagan failed to enforce.Yeah, that's voting for 1 of the 9 portions. I think that's why it passed. Too many voting for the 1 or 2 things they want versus realizing the other parts of that bill and the affect.
I have an acquaintance who is very blue politically speaking, activism, donations, etc...who told me the other day that he bought all the high capacity mags, drums, etc that he needed for all his firearms, but he still voted yes on 114, just "so nobody else could have them"....his exact words. It's one thing when some people vote for something out of pure ignorance or lack of education/information on the matter, and is another thing when sub humans act like he did. It's like filling up your tank and extra cannisters, and then blowing up the only gas station in the middle of the desert.
Typical Democrat hypocrisy. Just like what was shown in Martha's Vineyard.I have an acquaintance who is very blue politically speaking, activism, donations, etc...who told me the other day that he bought all the high capacity mags, drums, etc that he needed for all his firearms, but he still voted yes on 114, just "so nobody else could have them"....his exact words. It's one thing when some people vote for something out of pure ignorance or lack of education/information on the matter, and is another thing when sub humans act like he did. It's like filling up your tank and extra cannisters, and then blowing up the only gas station in the middle of the desert.