HighLine Firearms
Low Price Guns
J&B Firearm Sales
Sporting Systems
Oregon Rifleworks
Gun Deals
Oregon Arms & Ammunition
Simply Triggers
Southwest Firearms
DSG Arms
Defensive Arts
Advertise on Northwest Firearms
Buster Beaver Cerakote
Messages
6,807
Reactions
6,533
Guess it didn't work. :s0112::s0112:

Big tax hike in Oregon results in substantially less revenue

Of all those people who left Oregon how many jobs did they take with them?

"
The tax wasn't enacted into law until June 2009 but was retroactively applied to January 1, 2009. So for the first half of the year wealthy Oregon residents weren't able to take steps to avoid the tax ambush because they didn't see it coming. This suggests that a bigger revenue loss from tax mitigation strategies will show up on tax return data in 2010 and 2011. The Revenue Office has already downwardly revised tax collection projections for the first three years by one-third."

Read more at the Washington Examiner: <broken link removed>

jj
 
Messages
148
Reactions
1
...and a week after this nonsense passed, the mayor and his butties had a "brain storming" or "think tank" session on how to attract more businesses to the area. Unbelievable.
 
Messages
1,056
Reactions
140
This law was a freaking nightmare. Some of us file quarterly estimated taxes, and if you do not withhold enough you are liable for a penalty. When something is passed in June and then made retroactive your previously filed estimated taxes are obviously incorrect. There is a huge paper mountain required to certify and refile to avoid a penalty. The only ones seeing this stupid legislation as a good deal are the attorneys who are hired to try to deal with the tax issues arising from it.
 
Messages
319
Reactions
277
If you want less of something tax it. This works every time it is done and yet the politicians keep doing it. Correct me if I'm wrong here, but isn't insanity defined as doing the same thing and expecting a different outcome? That tells me the politicians that we keep re-electing are insane.
 
Messages
2,499
Reactions
2,859
If you want less of something tax it. This works every time it is done and yet the politicians keep doing it. Correct me if I'm wrong here, but isn't insanity defined as doing the same thing and expecting a different outcome? That tells me the politicians that we keep re-electing are insane.

Along with the idiots that keep voting for them !
 
Messages
4,996
Reactions
2,258
Just curious, did people actually leave the state? Is income down in the same percentages as tax revenue? Or did people ake just as much money and some just left the state?
 
Messages
6,597
Reactions
19,375
I never have understood why Oregon is so stupid in that regard.
Paging Dr. Moonbeam.
Paging Dr. Moonbeam.

Dr. Moonbeam to the statehouse please.
The Governor's chair is waiting.

Dr. Moonbeam?!? Are you there?!?
 
Messages
4,996
Reactions
2,258
Those questions sound too rational for this topic!
I was just curious if this article had any facts behind it. I know other states have lost huge amounts of revenue too. I was wondering if Oregon lost a larger percentage or smaller. Would income have been even lower without the new tax law?
 
Messages
1,182
Reactions
72
That article omits a few significant details, such as a WORLD WIDE RECESSION where even a quarter of the "rich" taxpayers have lost money on investments and can thus write-off other lost income and thus pay less taxes, or no taxes. They may have "disappeared" from the tax-paying rolls, but not necessarily moved out from the state; and no corporations have fled just because of a SMALL increase in their minimum corporate tax. The article aslo repeats the lie that Oregon has the "highest tax rates in the nation", but FORGETS TO NOTE OUR UNIQUE LACK OF A SALES TAX! Lies by ommission are still LIES. Is it even worth mentioning that it is easy to avoid taxes by simply re-investing income back into the business?

I DO agree that making those new tax laws retroactive to the start of the year was rotten. But raising income taxes on corporations and rich people was a very good thing, since we don't have what we really need for more tax fairness: a sales tax! I'd LOVE to see drug dealers and pimps paying their sales tax on their cigars and gold hubcaps so that we could reduce property taxes and enact the Homestead Exemption. Anybody remember that DECENT tax reduction plan?

These economic issues need a whole lot more analysis than what is found in biased blog reports and excerpts. Oh, yeah, if the rich corporations pay a little more taxes that won't be the main cause for them to leave the state, and then the rest of us can afford to buy more guns and ammo.................................elsullo

Guess it didn't work. :s0112::s0112:

Big tax hike in Oregon results in substantially less revenue

Of all those people who left Oregon how many jobs did they take with them?

"
The tax wasn't enacted into law until June 2009 but was retroactively applied to January 1, 2009. So for the first half of the year wealthy Oregon residents weren't able to take steps to avoid the tax ambush because they didn't see it coming. This suggests that a bigger revenue loss from tax mitigation strategies will show up on tax return data in 2010 and 2011. The Revenue Office has already downwardly revised tax collection projections for the first three years by one-third."

Read more at the Washington Examiner: <broken link removed>

jj
 
Messages
3,753
Reactions
626
I'd LOVE to see drug dealers and pimps paying their sales tax on their cigars and gold hubcaps so that we could reduce property taxes and enact the Homestead Exemption.

I would be happy to trade my property tax bill for a reasonable sales tax, because a sales tax is the fairest kind of tax there is. It is a consumption tax. If you don't consume it, you aren't taxed for it.
 
Messages
1,056
Reactions
140
You can argue tax increases either way...but making a tax RETROACTIVE for six months was just plain unfair to small business owners. If you want to stimulate the economy, or fund state operations...fine. But do it fairly.
 
You can argue tax increases either way...but making a tax RETROACTIVE for six months was just plain unfair to small business owners. If you want to stimulate the economy, or fund state operations...fine. But do it fairly.

What?
How can you say that retroactively taxing small business during a huge economic downturn was unfair?

Tax increases were the only way to pay for the unemployment for all of those small business employees that had to be laid off because of the tax increases.
 
Messages
1,182
Reactions
72
What?

Tax increases were the only way to pay for the unemployment for all of those small business employees that had to be laid off because of the tax increases.


Can you point to any actual EVIDENCE for that speculation? Documentaton? News reports? Something besides "conservative" blog verbiage? Statements like yours are often simply MADE UP to serve an opinion, but gain credence amongst the ignorant even when false..........................elsullo :confused:
 
Messages
393
Reactions
72
Money is transient, if it feels threatened or endanger it will migrate somewhere else.
The fact is more taxes equal less revenue, less tax equals more, Oregonians need to elect people that understand this simple concept.
 
Messages
1,056
Reactions
140
What?
How can you say that retroactively taxing small business during a huge economic downturn was unfair?

Tax increases were the only way to pay for the unemployment for all of those small business employees that had to be laid off because of the tax increases.

Sorry.....let me drink this cup of Democratic kool-aid......OK I see your point now. I am now convinced that we can tax our way out of recession...what was I thinking???? :huh:
 
Messages
4,996
Reactions
2,258
Money is transient, if it feels threatened or endanger it will migrate somewhere else.
The fact is more taxes equal less revenue, less tax equals more, Oregonians need to elect people that understand this simple concept.
How many companies left Oregon for other states of the union? How many rich people moved from the state?
 
Can you point to any actual EVIDENCE for that speculation? Documentaton? News reports? Something besides "conservative" blog verbiage? Statements like yours are often simply MADE UP to serve an opinion, but gain credence amongst the ignorant even when false..........................elsullo :confused:

I didnt read this on any blog or hear it on any show.
I could give you the names and phone numbers of the people I had to lay off... but I think I'd be violating some privacy laws.

When a business is barely scraping buy, and taxes are not only raised but made retroactive, you have to cut all corners possible. One of the easiest ways to free up revenue is to cut employees and consolidate duties.

When you get a 5+ figure tax bill at the end of the year, you better have the money in the bank to cover it... The state needs more money to pay the newly unemployed that were laid off in order to pay the taxes that the state needs to pay the unemployed etc etc etc.

But please, dont let reality get in the way of your 9 to 5 world. Idealism rocks. "rich" people and small businesses are evil... homeless panhandlers... that's the real moral high ground. :p
 
Advertise on Northwest Firearms
Copeland Custom Gunworks
NW Custom Firearms
Project Appleseed
DSG Arms
Cerberus Training Group
Oregon Arms & Ammunition
Sporting Systems
Southwest Firearms Forum

Upcoming Events

22 Rimfire Challenge
Redmond, OR
Rimfire Challenge July 31st @ DRRC
Eagle Creek, OR

Latest Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Top