Diamond Supporter
Platinum Supporter
Gold Lifetime
Silver Lifetime
Bronze Lifetime
- Messages
- 3,976
- Reactions
- 9,953
Interesting writing/photography problem. If it were me, I would leave the price the same but remove holster and ammo. Would mention the holster is also available and run a separate ad for it. I agree that you should cut the ref to .38sp. I think the ad is coming across as too desperate. If anything, the gun with goodies is underpriced, maybe enough to inhibit sales. I would cut most of the subjective praise words, and instead include why some people might like the non-underlug. Price is very reasonable for the gun without the goodies. I think the holster is essentially not helping because most people who want the gun don't use shoulder holsters. I would list holster for 1/3 to 1/2 new price, but might as part of a deal with the gun throw in the holster for 20 more. That's so little most people would want the holster just to try. I'd totally stay firm on the price of the gun. Cut the words where you are evaluating the gun and deal. Your statements "excellent condition" and "functions flawlessly plus the photos says it all. Also cut the phrase "revolver pistol". To many of us, a revolver is not a pistol. A pistol is a semiauto. And the use of the word pistol in talking about a revolver is like fingernails on a chalkboard for some, me included. (For others, "pistol" is a generic handgun that could be either a revolver or semiauto. But many who might be interested in this gun might be turned off by it's being called a pistol.)I've been trying to sell my Ruger GP100. For some time. Listed a few times over the past year or so.
So I'm wondering if I'm charging too much, or something else is wrong with my listing. Started out with a price that I found others sold for, but no bites. Lowered the price by quite a bit. No bites. Added ammo and matched holster. Nada.
Any advice?
Thanks in advance!
Frank in Hillsboro
View attachment 485090
So I would revise to:
Ruger GP100 .357mag 6" Revolver.
Rare half-lug version. Excellent condition. Circa 1988. Functions flawlessly. Half-lug variant gives traditional rather than muzzle-heavy balance and less overall weight for the barrel length. Faux pearl and wood grip panel inserts. $550 firm. For shoulder holster see separate listing.
If I could easily get info on SA and DA trigger weight I would add that. Is the SA trigger crisp and light? (Which it might be on a used Ruger.) If so, say so, as that is one if the reasons why many people buy sw or modify their rugers with replacement springs and action jobs.)
You have all the relevant photos, but as someone who sells garden photography and writing, I have to say I think the photos are really hurting and turnng off sales for a relatively esoteric reason. It's the emotional flavor of the photos as caused by the white balance. I suspect that the white balance in the photos is more important than anything you said. It makes the photos (and hence the gun and the deal) seem cold and emotionally unappealing. The background is black and the gun is silver. So the photos are essentially black and white instead of colored. A colored background would have been more attractive. The white balance is on the blue rather than yellow side. Like the light on a cold rainy day. It creates emotional coldness. If it were me, I would reshoot the photos with a green or blue background, and I would use the warmest white balance setting I could use without actually making the SS of the gun start looking yellowish. If I didnt have a camera that gives me control of white balance, I would shoot at sunset on a cloudless day, just when the fading light casts no shadows, but has a lot of orange in it. A minor detail. I would shoot the main photo with the hammer not cocked. It gives a more classic appearance, particularly with revolvers that don't have firing pins on the hammer.
Last Edited: