Perhaps a better statement would be " why not address these issues instead of feeding them with barrels of tax money ". Keeping criminals in jail, and making welfare unattractive aren't the same as going full Khmer Rouge.
Not the same thing at all. My God given rights are protected by the constitution are not the same as a retail store charging me a membership fee to access their retail products.
States are passing laws to swear them in as Police Officers.
supreme.justia.com
lawyers in black robes aren't always going to be on our side.
Yep and many might be surprised how many gun owners have no problem with CCW permits. I think some feel special to be in that club. Personally I think every Tom, Dick and Harriet should be able to carry without a permit. They should be able to buy without a permit or a background check. No infringement should mean no infringement but that interpretation was lost a long time ago.Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943)
Murdock v. Pennsylvania: It is unconstitutional for a state to tax people selling religious merchandise.
"4. A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution. P. 319 U. S. 113. " -related to religious freedom and distribution of religious materials; but should also apply to 2A.
And yet States still impose charges for background checks, licenses/permits to carry, and in some, a purchase permit/license/"safety certificate"
Ain't that the sad truth. People as a whole, are far too comfortable, content, complacent to do anything beyond talk. Things have to get real bad and people need real pain to wake up but as you surmise, it'd be too late for the majority
Sadly as always when things like this come up its all the same. The "rights" we are supposed to have are just a piece of paper. Some black robe can at any time just tell you its no longer a right. After that people have to find another black robe to tell the first one they were wrong. Sadly WAY too many people just don't care until some "right" of theirs gets stepped on. Boy do they get angry then but, its often too late by then.Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943)
Murdock v. Pennsylvania: It is unconstitutional for a state to tax people selling religious merchandise.
"4. A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution. P. 319 U. S. 113. " -related to religious freedom and distribution of religious materials; but should also apply to 2A.
And yet States still impose charges for background checks, licenses/permits to carry, and in some, a purchase permit/license/"safety certificate"
Yeah I didn't mean killing fields so much as a more extreme welfare state. Which I don't wanna pay for either. Or tolerate.
Not how it was told or taught to me by people who literally worked in these places. It was all about preserving the Civil rights and "dignity" of those under State care that they were moved out of institutions. The movie One Flew over cuckoo nest helped, and the other one "where's Molly?" About the Fairview mental institute; also brought about the death of institutes for mentally ill and disabled people.
Don't forget Geraldo.
They are membership cards - not a 'permit to purchase'.
A good start would be to get the people who claim to be conservative, pro 2A but do NOT vote to crawl out from under their rocks and to at least get informed and to vote.
