- Messages
- 1,432
- Reactions
- 3,251
I agree with the premise that for military/LEO roles, the Glock is vastly superior to the Beretta 92FS aka M9.
I would far prefer to carry one and rely on one.
Having said that, wars are not won or lost on handguns, and I understand why they went with and stuck with the M9. It's stupid, it's politics, it's budgets, training/learning curves, etc. And as noted, in small numbers, special operators are allowed to pick what they want and we did have some that carried Glocks (I saw Glocks, Sigs, 1911s, Browning HPs, and a few others) in my Group. I carried a BHP on a deployment.
When it was time to switch, however, they should have just adopted the Glock models off the shelf rather than spend time/money/energy on the trials and ultimately picked Sig, which was a boondoggle from the start. The Glocks are tried and true for decades and they could have just dispensed with trials and given Glock the opportunity for a great contract.
I would far prefer to carry one and rely on one.
Having said that, wars are not won or lost on handguns, and I understand why they went with and stuck with the M9. It's stupid, it's politics, it's budgets, training/learning curves, etc. And as noted, in small numbers, special operators are allowed to pick what they want and we did have some that carried Glocks (I saw Glocks, Sigs, 1911s, Browning HPs, and a few others) in my Group. I carried a BHP on a deployment.
When it was time to switch, however, they should have just adopted the Glock models off the shelf rather than spend time/money/energy on the trials and ultimately picked Sig, which was a boondoggle from the start. The Glocks are tried and true for decades and they could have just dispensed with trials and given Glock the opportunity for a great contract.