- Messages
- 6,779
- Reactions
- 1,275
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And no one thinks that Romney will not be as detrimental as Obama " supposedly" will be with our gun rights. I think either way we as gun owners lose. I myself am undecided and Romney is not helping me make that decision. I do not trust either politician and the question becomes do you trust the devil you know or the one you dont and pray for something better.
James Ruby
Asking the Republicans or the Democrats to handle out national debt problem is like asking two alcoholics to watch a liquor store.
As far as the 2nd Amendment goes, Romney has a lot of work to prove that he is doing anything more than the bare minimum to attract NRA donations.
Ron Paul is still running and is the only true supporter of the second amendment.
Don't forget about Supreme court nominations! Vote Obama and you'll give him the chance to tip the Supreme court and irrevocably and permanently ruin this country.
That is all.
Alas, Ron doesn't stand a chance. Anyone who believes otherwise is delusional. Anybody who thinks a vote for Ron Paul ISNT a vote for Obama may also suffer a similar delusion.
What we're talking about here, folks, is not Romney or Obama per se, but SCOTUS. Would you rather have Romney appoint moderates/conservatives to the Supreme Court, or Obama appoint another far left whack job? Do you want Romney installing moderate/conservative judges to the federal bench, or Obama stacking the bench with far left extremists?
The pundits were also already going after Marco Rubio Monday morning over the possibility he might be the veep nominee. The sticking point? Get ready to belch:
Mr. Rubio has only been in the Senate for two years. What experience does he have to become president, in the off chance he might have to accept that job?
Well, uhhhh......
You are only hoping that Romney will appoint a judge that supports the second amendment but as far as I can tell unless you are privledged to insider information have no evidence of such a position. Romney has already given his hand away based on what he supported in Ma. Why would we expect different once he is the president. Either way it does not look good.
James Ruby
Id rather go with a maybe negative than a known negative that is known for apportioning leftist wackos to SCOTUS
Alas, Ron doesn't stand a chance. Anyone who believes otherwise is delusional. Anybody who thinks a vote for Ron Paul ISNT a vote for Obama may also suffer a similar delusion.
What we're talking about here, folks, is not Romney or Obama per se, but SCOTUS. Would you rather have Romney appoint moderates/conservatives to the Supreme Court, or Obama appoint another far left whack job? Do you want Romney installing moderate/conservative judges to the federal bench, or Obama stacking the bench with far left extremists?
The pundits were also already going after Marco Rubio Monday morning over the possibility he might be the veep nominee. The sticking point? Get ready to belch:
Mr. Rubio has only been in the Senate for two years. What experience does he have to become president, in the off chance he might have to accept that job?
Well, uhhhh......
I have no more faith in Romney than I do in Obama. I do not see enough difference. The fact that one is Republican and the other is a Democrat means very little.
James Ruby
I think you're missing the point,
I agree they're the same and in 4 years of presidency there will be little difference, Supreme court justices though are appointed for life and that is a long term problem, if we swing the balance to the leftists your constitutional rights will suffer long term and our freedoms will be suffer.