- Messages
- 18,744
- Reactions
- 45,465
No he is not, see post #23, it is pretty clear what he is saying.He's saying he wants to fire on his fellow citizens who disagree with him. I have a problem with that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No he is not, see post #23, it is pretty clear what he is saying.He's saying he wants to fire on his fellow citizens who disagree with him. I have a problem with that.
This, truth hurts. Tough.I suspect a LOT of people are going to be angry at his trolling by reminding people which party started the klan. So they will of course pretend they do not get what he was saying. His ad hits a little too close to home for many.
Neither this is a very true telling of American history.Holy crap Batman. It was captioned and I couldn't tell if this was humor or ridicule? I'm cornfused.
Eh .. I think the imagery suggested a tad more than simple disagreement.He's saying he wants to fire on his fellow citizens who disagree with him. I have a problem with that.
You're not the only one thoroughly cornfused.Holy crap Batman. It was captioned and I couldn't tell if this was humor or ridicule? I'm cornfused.
And the fact that our current "pres" did the eulogy for the head of the KKK not all that long ago. Its pretty recent valid history points. Pieces of chit are still alive and well currently and that's a problem no matter what color skin or clothes they wear.Well if you do your research you'll see that the "klan" was started by democrats. Jerone's ad makes perfect sense if you know the history.
Well we know what party plays politics in regards to race…. They may not being wearing white hoods but they exemplify racism in their words and through their actions. The look of the Democratic Party may have changed but their ideology hasn't.Started by Dems, but I wonder which party the current Klan members self identify with.
Maybe still the Dems, maybe not
Yes, but we also know who flies confederate flags* and who they tend to associate with so there is that.Well we know what party plays politics in regards to race…. They may not being wearing white hoods but they exemplify racism in their words and through their actions. The look of the Democratic Party may have changed but their ideology hasn't.
It's also about the racism that the potential candidate has experienced first hand… hence the reason for the necessity of firearm ownership…. The two go hand in hand in the campaign video correct?This thread is about a 2A ad campaign.
It's also about the racism that the potential candidate has experienced first hand… hence the reason for the necessity of firearm ownership…. The two go hand in hand in the campaign video correct?
I am not here to argue for the confederate flag.
Ahh, great tactic from the resident Contrarian; drop an off-topic reference to shoot your shot, and then play diplomat and refuse to engage in any further discussion on said topic that you brought up.Yes, but we also know who flies confederate flags* and who they tend to associate with so there is that.
*don't care that someone might want to argue the imaginary nonracist reason to fly the Confederate Battle Flag or that you have an overwhelming desire to educate me on the 'real' story behind the flag and flying it. Heard it all before, can't imagine that anyone has anything new that would change my mind and that road inevitably leads to thread lock
So I think he correctly and accurately identified the klan as democrats, historical facts cannot be ignored.Primely because I don't believe that we should be electing representatives based on their willingness to kill the opposition party even if it's just a nudge and a wink to willingness. And he's not alone, have you seen the one from Eric Greitens?
Greitens defends heavily criticized 'RINO-hunting' ad - ABC17NEWS
Former Missouri governor and U.S. Senate candidate Eric Greitens defended a campaign ad that sparked harsh backlash in a radio appearance Tuesday morning.abc17news.com
Agreed. I'm just glad we have a multitude of men and women from different backgrounds, religion, race and experiences who stand up and fight for the importance of the second amendment. Whatever your reason is, it's important.The ad creator has his HIS views and HIS experiences.
Use care in responses.
There was nothing off topic about my reference and I didn't bring it up.Ahh, great tactic from the resident Contrarian; drop an off-topic reference to shoot your shot, and then play diplomat and refuse to engage in any further discussion on said topic that you brought up.
It's almost an art form!
And another one bites the dust.Yes, but we also know who flies confederate flags* and who they tend to associate with so there is that.
*don't care that someone might want to argue the imaginary nonracist reason to fly the Confederate Battle Flag or that you have an overwhelming desire to educate me on the 'real' story behind the flag and flying it. Heard it all before, can't imagine that anyone has anything new that would change my mind and that road inevitably leads to thread lock
I disagree.There was nothing off topic about my reference and I didn't bring it up.
As for being "diplomatic" I believe you misunderstood what I was saying
One of the reasons I think the 2A is not even up for debate under any circumstances is the way the cartel's use the mostly defenseless public against them. I think this is on the forefront of most Hispanics minds* as well. *and they KNOW damn well they NEED more than 10rnds to stand up to these organized thugs.that the 2nd Amendment is theirs just as much as the "old white guys". One of my best friends is Hispanic, and a hard-core 2A guy.
I think that's precisely what any logical person only saw. Nothing more. People read way too much into things these days it seams.Rhetoric aside, all I saw was a clear willingness of a man to defend his family, not "kill the opposition party".