- Messages
- 1,718
- Reactions
- 3,730
Thought this might be germane to our conversation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
''Two people divided by a common language''.
George Mason, co-author of the Second Amendment
"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them." – Speech in the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 14, 1778
What happened to his magazine? Did he hit the boolit button?
He's ''The Duke''. He don't need no stinking bullets!
Plus that's an 1875 AR-15. And everybody knows they didn't have magazines back then. Duh!
Ok, so I'm relatively new here (been lurking for a few weeks) and also that rarest of birds, a liberal (small 'l', please note the difference) gun owner. From my perspective, I completely agree with anyone who blocked the bill that would have prevented people on the terrorist "watch list" from purchasing guns. It's just plain unconstitutional, and bad laws don't do a damn thing other than make ignorant people feel like they've "done something" about gun violence. Like Tac said, gun bans and gun control laws demonstrably do not work. Unless it's another "we-need-to-feel-good-about-ourselves" ploy where they can point to "lowered gun violence" (well duh, they always include suicides in those "30,000 gun deaths per year" numbers anyway, and with a gun ban, of course the numbers will go down). Thing is, murder rates don't change when you ban guns. In the UK and Wales, Jamaica, and (gasp) Washington DC they went up after the gun bans went in to place. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that perhaps the problem isn't with the tool, but maybe with the society.
I think that fundamentally, people who think that nobody but law enforcement or the military should own a gun live in a far, far different (and maybe even better) world than I do. That's fine for them, but I can't possibly be alone in knowing that the world is not a safe place, for anyone, at any time. You wear a seat belt when you drive a car because you might get in an accident. Why should carrying a pistol for self defense be any different? If we don't, as a society, get together and figure out what's causing these incidents we're not going to be able to stop them. Even if we do figure out what's causing them, we're never going to live in a safe world. The price of our personal freedoms comes with risk, but I'd rather be free than feel a false sense of safety. I think this is something the Founding Fathers knew very well, but a good portion of the populace has forgotten.
Thought this might be germane to our conversation.
that rarest of birds, a liberal... gun owner