By the gun grabber's logic, we could have saved a ton of money by just passing a lot of international laws against terrorists, EIDs, attacking hospitals/churches/schools..................Oh, wait................
Folks.......MASS SHOOTERS ARE TERRORISTS. Force protection through legislation is about as rediculous as what I said above. We don't rely on international law to protect our soldiers overseas, we HARDEN THE TARGET and meet them with opposing force. So, why is that OK for our soldiers but not our children?
If we just designate Iraq/Afghanistan, etc. as TERRORISM-FREE ZONES, all will be well. And don't forget your "awareness bracelet". Maybe a benefit concert?
Folks.......MASS SHOOTERS ARE TERRORISTS. Force protection through legislation is about as rediculous as what I said above. We don't rely on international law to protect our soldiers overseas, we HARDEN THE TARGET and meet them with opposing force. So, why is that OK for our soldiers but not our children?
If we just designate Iraq/Afghanistan, etc. as TERRORISM-FREE ZONES, all will be well. And don't forget your "awareness bracelet". Maybe a benefit concert?
