Let’s get on Offense...I like it.
Ever heard an anti say, "Don't I have a right to feel safe?"."Your facts/rights stop were my feelings start"
To the "it" in the photo...go grab yourself a bag weed, find a medium, have a little seance and ask the hundreds of millions slaughtered by tyrannical anti-gun regimes. Any other stupid question|?Ever heard an anti say, "Don't I have a right to feel safe?".
The answer always shocks them because in their mind this question is an argument-ender.
The answer, of course, is just, "No".
Nonsense like this and ,"If there were no guns, there'd be no shootings" are the nuclear option to them, simple little gits that they are.
View attachment 600901
You get the look. The look that says "You no longer exist in my world". And they walk away happily oblivious. Oh, that's right. sometimes they say "We're just going to have to agree to disagree". THEN they walk away, yada, yada.Ever heard an anti say, "Don't I have a right to feel safe?".
I've had to do that myself... sort of.sometimes they say "We're just going to have to agree to disagree"
Ya' know, as soon as I hear something parroted from the anti 2nd media, or anti 2nd political talk, I give up. I wish I was better at it. Or, that some of these people would actually like to hear another angle to what they've heard on the media. I lost hope, so once I get the mind made up cue, I quit.I've had to do that myself... sort of.
Usually, after attempting to set them straight on everything from the purpose of the Constitution and BOR (they restrict the government's power, period. Not grant goodies to citizens. Not enable THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT to Keep and Bear Arms [the Nat'l Guard argument]) to how specifically their "statistics" are massaged to the point of being outright lies and that everything they've been told about guns is pure paranoid fantasy, even I get tired of banging my head against the wall.
As a general rule, if someone's foundational arguments, confidently presented as facts, are propaganda and lies that can easily be debunked, then I know the conversation (and their "cause") is a waste of time and will devolve quickly into name calling and feelings-based nonsense once they run out of talking points.
I'm happy, enthusiastic in fact, to debate. But my tolerance for willful ignorance has an embarrassingly short shelf-life... "We can't talk anymore... you're too narrow-minded" leaves them fuming.