Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wouldn't it be nice if the people that broke into the home and stole the weapons were actually treated like criminals instead of the home owner? Honestly, we shouldn't have to even lock our doors. Stop treating the victims like criminals and the criminals like victims.
agreed... and that scares meIt's the first step to back-door registration; 'Thank you, sir, for reporting your total number of owned firearms. Now could you give us the serial numbers for our records? ...just in case they get stolen of course.'
The country is in a backwards spiral. Indiana just passed a law allowing police to enter your home unwarranted. They did away with the 4th amendment, so here we go.
No, it was a court ruling, not a law. And the they didn't rule remotely what you wrote.
Are you intentionally exaggerating to the point of ridiculousness or did you just fail reading comprehension and civics 101?
Read the ruling. They ruled that you can't resist an illegal police search/entry with force. The court said that you didn't have the RIGHT to use force to resist police. I think it's a bad ruling and I hope it will get overturned. But that's a far cry from not requiring warrants. All they did was insist that you can't resist with force. Instead, (according to the ruling) you're expected to get redress through the courts.
They ruled that you can't resist an illegal police search/entry with force. The court said that you didn't have the RIGHT to use force to resist police. I think it's a bad ruling and I hope it will get overturned. But that's a far cry from not requiring warrants.
No, it was a court ruling, not a law. And the they didn't rule remotely what you wrote.
Are you intentionally exaggerating to the point of ridiculousness or did you just fail reading comprehension and civics 101?
Read the ruling. They ruled that you can't resist an illegal police search/entry with force. The court said that you didn't have the RIGHT to use force to resist police. I think it's a bad ruling and I hope it will get overturned. But that's a far cry from not requiring warrants. All they did was insist that you can't resist with force. Instead, (according to the ruling) you're expected to get redress through the courts.
Knickers in a snit about a proposal for a city ordinance in a locale 3000 miles away? Hmm. Some folks gotta lotta time on their hands. I'm more worried about my inability to find reasonably priced .454 Cassull without tapping the internet.
No need to take my word for it. <broken link removed>
That seems to be taken from this blog spot.
Why Grown Men Should Never Use Emoticons | Sloshspot Blog
Other Recent Blog Posts there
2/24 The 8 Best Celebrity Booze Advertisements
2/23 A Man's Guide to Wearing Hosiery (Mantyhose)
2/23 Meanwhile on Fox News
2/22 Hallucinogens: The Wonderful World Of Peyote
2/21 Full Metal Beetle Bailey
You try so hard CEF.....................and fail even harder. "Thanks for playing and we have some lovely parting gifts backstage" LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL!
Thanks for giving me a good laugh!