- Messages
- 2,794
- Reactions
- 2,489
Whatever y'all do I'd strongly suggest going (apparently) unarmed. Open Carry rally in Olympia or anywhere else is just throwing gas on the fire, trust me on this one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nice, it looks like it is time to get the manufacturers on board.
My guess is that if the manufacturers of weapons procured by law enforcement were to weigh in on the side of the law abiding, minds would be changed.
...
I like the idea of not being openly armed, as well. I think the image projected while appearing unarmed would be far more helpful for attracting people on the fence.
By they, nice forum you all have here. I've lurked for a while, but figured now was a great time to sign up,
Don't you know? They make baby-killing machines. Who would listen to them?
In all seriousness, no manufacturer is going to give us the time of day. They fight their own fight in what seems almost like another reality from our perspective. I wish it weren't so, but if one of them where to support the position of a group of citizens, it would be seen as an endorsement. Just imagine how bad it would look for one of these companies if so much as one citizen affiliated with the group did something assinine, like run around the Capitol open carrying an AK while wearing a tinfoil hat and shouting about reptilian overlords. Yeah. We all know that those guys are among us.
They are starting to call this "The Barrett Effect." http://bearingarms.com/the-barrett-...irearms-to-government-agencies-in-california/
Barrett doesn't sell .50 BMG rifles to any law enforcement agency in California because of the way they treat their citizens regarding the 2A and possession of these rifles by citizens.
Magpul picked up their entire operation very publicly and moved it out of state when Colorado fell down the libturd rabbit hole.
Beretta told Maryland to bugger off and moved to Tennessee because of their stance on the 2A.
Remington moved entire operations to places like North Carolina because of Connecticut's laws.
Looks to me that some are already on board and that they don't care what some yeah-hoo with with an AK and a tin foil hat does.
And it is getting notice. This is from the 2014 SHOT Show.
During SHOT Show, it was revealed that Ruger will stop selling semi-automatic pistols in the state (of CA), as they have not found a way to comply with the demands of the state's absurd microstamping law.
Ruger CEO Mike Fifer explained that they aren't voluntarily leaving the California market, but are being forced out by the California's government.
A distributor suggests that Smith & Wesson is going the same route with their semi-automatics, and it appears that other gun companies will likely be forced to stop selling semi-automatic pistols in the state.
I like the stance that these manufacturers are taking: "Citizens can't buy it from us? Then you can't either. The State Police and LAPD better start looking for holsters for Louisville sluggers, because pretty soon, that is all they will have.
Things are going to get interesting....
They are starting to call this "The Barrett Effect." http://bearingarms.com/the-barrett-...irearms-to-government-agencies-in-california/
Barrett doesn't sell .50 BMG rifles to any law enforcement agency in California because of the way they treat their citizens regarding the 2A and possession of these rifles by citizens.
Magpul picked up their entire operation very publicly and moved it out of state when Colorado fell down the libturd rabbit hole.
Beretta told Maryland to bugger off and moved to Tennessee because of their stance on the 2A.
Remington moved entire operations to places like North Carolina because of Connecticut's laws.
Looks to me that some are already on board and that they don't care what some yeah-hoo with with an AK and a tin foil hat does.
And it is getting notice. This is from the 2014 SHOT Show.
During SHOT Show, it was revealed that Ruger will stop selling semi-automatic pistols in the state (of CA), as they have not found a way to comply with the demands of the state's absurd microstamping law.
Ruger CEO Mike Fifer explained that they aren't voluntarily leaving the California market, but are being forced out by the California's government.
A distributor suggests that Smith & Wesson is going the same route with their semi-automatics, and it appears that other gun companies will likely be forced to stop selling semi-automatic pistols in the state.
I like the stance that these manufacturers are taking: "Citizens can't buy it from us? Then you can't either. The State Police and LAPD better start looking for holsters for Louisville sluggers, because pretty soon, that is all they will have.
Things are going to get interesting....