- Messages
- 2,862
- Reactions
- 6,082
We believe the 2nd Amendment is best defended through grass-roots organization, education, and advocacy centered around individual gun owners. It is our mission to encourage, organize, and support these efforts throughout Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming.
CREATE FREE ACCOUNT Already a member? Log InI know this is in CA and applies to CHL's, but I somehow think the same incompetence would play out 1 for 1 in a PTP system.
I guess he'd rather watch the dumpster fire instead of be in it.
This would have been a repeat of post # 7829The AG is extremely political... always has been, always will be. As for remaining "neutral"... what's that supposed to mean? They are charged with enforcing the laws of the state. BM-114 was passed by a majority of the voters in the state and while not yet encoded into ORS, it IS (or will be in some form) state law. The AG's job is to defend it in court against any challenges. They'll use every tool they can to do so.
Now in my opinion... in a sane and just world, a reasonable AG would look at BM-114, see how blatantly unconstitutional it is, and perhaps decide to either slow-walk the implementation/enforcement of it, or maybe even side with the plaintiffs and ask for a court-ordered injuction... throw it in the legislature's lap, let them sort it out. They would also probably be accused of being "political" and "not neutral" by the liberals/left, who wouldn't necessarily be wrong! So the AG would deflect those accusations by saying that trying to defend such a ridiculous law is a waste of resources.
But we don't live in a sane or just world. I'm not trying to be a jerk, just point out reality. You can't expect a highly political office to not act... politically.
Sadly this is probably the case.I'm betting they forced him out to replace him with one that's pro 114.
Are there any live streams or update feeds for the hearing?For those that are interested, the hearing is at 10am today for the injunction request.
Also interesting to read that Kate Brown's handpicked female superintendent is retiring Jan 31, after only 2 years in the post. Tina Kotex will appoint the next one.
I'm betting they forced him out to replace him with one that's pro 114.
Put the replacement's name into DuckDuckGo and you will find some very interesting information about him.Sadly this is probably the case.
LaVoy Finicum? Hands up in Malheur county? Codding was the one who shot LaVoy, not the FBI likey they originally thoughtAlso interesting to read that Kate Brown's handpicked female superintendent is retiring Jan 31, after only 2 years in the post. Tina Kotex will appoint the next one.
Put the replacement's name into DuckDuckGo and you will find some very interesting information about him.
Talked with three different people today who have always had instant approval. They've been put in the queue now. Several local FFLs are stepping up and invoking the 3-day rule now as a result.Does anyone know if they are even still processing BCs? People I know who have always gotten instant approval are being put in the queue now.