Quantcast
  1. Sign up now and join over 35,000 northwest gun owners. It's quick, easy, and 100% free!

One-Percenters Gun Control Would Mean 'Handgun Registration' for Washington State

Discussion in 'Legal & Political Archive' started by U201491, Sep 11, 2014.

  1. U201491

    U201491 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,857
    Likes Received:
    10,560
    One-Percenters Gun Control Would Mean 'Handgun Registration' for Washington State
    http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/i...andgun-registration-for-washington-state.aspx

    AND

    NRA-ILA | Washington Gun Control Ballot Measure Would Criminalize Common Common Firing Range Occurance
    http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/in-the-news/2014/9/washington-gun-control-ballot-measure-would-criminalize-common-common-firing-range-occurance.aspx
    Washington Gun Control Ballot Measure Would Criminalize Common Common Firing Range Occurance
    Posted on September 11, 2014
    Print Email Share
    A gun control ballot measure expected in the upcoming elections in Washington State could turn law-abiding citizens into criminals by the thousands at places like gun shows and gun ranges.
    According to the National Rifle Association (NRA), Ballot Initiative 594 could make the act of simply lending one’s gun to another person without a background check by a licensed dealer, at a firing range, for example, illegal.
    The NRA contends that I-594, if passed, would make it that essentially each time a firearm changes hands, the transfer would have to be processed through a licensed dealer.
    Read More: Breitbart.com
    Learn more about this anti-gun initiative by visiting http://www.VoteNo594.com
     
    Blitzkrieg and 3MTA3 like this.
  2. ZA_Survivalist

    ZA_Survivalist Oregon AK's all day.

    Messages:
    4,653
    Likes Received:
    5,766
    Absolutely sick.
     
    3MTA3 and U201491 like this.
  3. TacticalDragQueen

    TacticalDragQueen E.WA Member

    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    57
    Washington already has a handgun registry...this would mean ALL gun registry. Why should I be criminalized for sharing my firearms with a friend. I already feel insulted when I have to go thru a NICS check at a FFL. The stress of being denied because of a clerical error is ever looming and that stress would double when its a rare or family heirloom firearm that you are lending a friend or family member. How many times have you taken a loved one out for a day of plinking to show them a few firearms before they made a purchase?
     
    Brutus57, Blitzkrieg and Sgt Nambu like this.
  4. erudne

    erudne The Pie Matrix PPL Say Sleeping W/Your Rifle Is A bad Thing? Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    6,279
    Likes Received:
    6,918
    original.jpg?w=600&h
     
    Brutus57, Blitzkrieg and timac like this.
  5. Wayne

    Wayne Near Tacoma Active Member

    Messages:
    174
    Likes Received:
    207
    TacticalDragQueen likes this.
  6. Sgt Nambu

    Sgt Nambu Oregon Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    7,591
    Likes Received:
    10,720
    They don't want citizens teaching other citizens how to shoot! Just IMHO.
     
    Brutus57 likes this.
  7. Oklahomie

    Oklahomie Marysville Active Member

    Messages:
    461
    Likes Received:
    171
  8. Caveman Jim

    Caveman Jim West of Oly Springer Slayer 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    5,280
    Likes Received:
    8,997
    OTE="Taku, post: 1150450, member: 539"]One-Percenters Gun Control Would Mean 'Handgun Registration' for Washington State
    http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/i...andgun-registration-for-washington-state.aspx

    AND

    NRA-ILA | Washington Gun Control Ballot Measure Would Criminalize Common Common Firing Range Occurance
    http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/in-the-news/2014/9/washington-gun-control-ballot-measure-would-criminalize-common-common-firing-range-occurance.aspx
    Washington Gun Control Ballot Measure Would Criminalize Common Common Firing Range Occurance
    Posted on September 11, 2014
    Print Email Share
    A gun control ballot measure expected in the upcoming elections in Washington State could turn law-abiding citizens into criminals by the thousands at places like gun shows and gun ranges.
    According to the National Rifle Association (NRA), Ballot Initiative 594 could make the act of simply lending one’s gun to another person without a background check by a licensed dealer, at a firing range, for example, illegal.
    The NRA contends that I-594, if passed, would make it that essentially each time a firearm changes hands, the transfer would have to be processed through a licensed dealer.
    Read More: Breitbart.com
    Learn more about this anti-gun initiative by visiting http://www.VoteNo594.com[/QUOTE]
    Rex

    Rex wretching!!!!! How dare you put that hag on this thread, now I have to go get more lunch!!!!!!o_O

    The gross pig Pic is on post #4....wretching again........
     
    Last edited: Sep 12, 2014
    Stomper likes this.
  9. TacticalDragQueen

    TacticalDragQueen E.WA Member

    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    57
    I cant see the pic....maybe that's a good thing!!
     
  10. Stomper

    Stomper Oceania Rising White Is The New Brown Silver Supporter

    Messages:
    12,912
    Likes Received:
    19,573
  11. Caveman Jim

    Caveman Jim West of Oly Springer Slayer 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    5,280
    Likes Received:
    8,997
    I sure hope she is in restraints at rest home in Florida!!!
     
    Brutus57 likes this.
  12. Oklahomie

    Oklahomie Marysville Active Member

    Messages:
    461
    Likes Received:
    171
    Consider yourself lucky.
     
  13. Kable

    Kable Lynnwood Active Member

    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    171
    Yeah I just watched the debate last night that Komo News did, which can be viewed here http://www.komonews.com/home/video/KOMO-to-host-Town-Hall-Special-Guns-in-America-274134031.html

    Ralph from WAGR tried to say that the pro gun side were lying and that it absolutely did not have registration in the bill... And then later on he kept talking about how the registration is needed... I594 absolutely creates a total handgun registry in WA state. We all need to make sure we vote and convince everyone we know to make sure they are registered to vote and vote NO on 594. I've already convinced a couple of people that would have voted yes on it to vote no after I explained exactly why it is so bad.
     
    WilliamIV and 44mag2ndamend like this.
  14. 44mag2ndamend

    44mag2ndamend Round the ole tree stump, Down by the crick Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    790
    Likes Received:
    455
    If you took one of these individuals and placed them in a scenario of self defense, life or death, and vividly described what our Constitution consists of to protect themselves you will begin to change minds. Our most powerful ally with this is common sense persuasion. Knowledge of our current laws is empowerment by itself. That alone could be enough to turn the tide even more.

    Here in is the battle, most people will not even read laws, due to either fear, or misinterpretation, or just plain ole ignorance. If you empowered to vote on something, you most undoubtedly do your research first.

    The news broadcast is not even worth watching in my opinion, I know how downright dumb it would be. Then again I am biased or made up my mind. Not, knowing the Constitution is a Responsibility.
     
  15. GunnyG

    GunnyG The Highlands Active Member

    Messages:
    259
    Likes Received:
    183
    "Total" is correct.

    FWIW, it would be expanding the WA DOL pistol registry (which is quite readily accessible from the computer in every cop car in the state) to include every legal transfer of a handgun except for between spouses or gifts to family (I'm sure that will be amended later...)

    Picture1.png
     
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2014
    Caveman Jim likes this.
  16. Kable

    Kable Lynnwood Active Member

    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    171
    And I'm sure if this passes it won't be long before the legislature expands the registry to include all firearms not just hand guns
     
  17. Ben Beckerich

    Ben Beckerich NW Oregon Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    3,917
    Likes Received:
    2,343
  18. Cosmic Osmo

    Cosmic Osmo PDX New Member

    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    2
  19. GunnyG

    GunnyG The Highlands Active Member

    Messages:
    259
    Likes Received:
    183
    http://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/AssaultWeapons-report.pdf

    It has made headlines all over:

    http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/09/12/finally-waving-the-white-flag-on-the-assault-weapons-ban/

    "...The CAP report makes official what advocates have aimed for since the post-Newtown focus landed on background checks. A ProPublica report this week quoted a series of advocates saying they officially support an assault weapons ban but have abandoned the fight for it.
    "We’ve very much changed our strategy to focus on public safety measures that will save the most lives,” Shannon Watts, the founder of Mr. Bloomberg’s Moms Demand Action, told ProPublica.
    Instead, CAP makes an argument for six policy prescriptions that are equally unlikely to receive a hearing in a Congress with zero appetite for any gun restrictions: implement background checks for all gun sales, force dealers to report to the federal government multiple sales of long guns, expand the prohibition on interstate handgun sales to include shotguns and rifles, forbid the use or possession of machine guns by people younger than 16, and require licenses and permits to possess an assault rifle or manufacture guns using 3D printers...."
     
  20. Norm0931

    Norm0931 Hillsboro, OR Sgt. Sheep Silver Vendor 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    1,454
    Likes Received:
    1,469
    What blew me away was how much the Washginton Ceasefire guy didn't talk about making sure criminals didn't have guns but rather "taking away the rights of people." He said that phrase lots of times during the course of the town hall. I also like the part about how, "if people think you are a danger to society, you are involuntarily committed and we remove their gun rights." Exactly the issue, gun rights denied with absolutely no due process. I can't believe they let him just outright lie on the program though. That's poor journalism honestly. The funniest thing was every time an issue making normal citizens felons was brought up they referenced one prosecutor, who they couldn't stress enough was republican, said he didn't think they would be prosecuted, even when a prosecutor in the audience told him he was wrong.

    IMO Phil from SAF was a little weak though.