- Messages
- 4,279
- Reactions
- 10,739
Recall the results, from a previous post, of the 160 AB from a T3 7mm Rem Mag:
I went to the range today to confirm the precision and accuracy of this load, and took along the remains of the seating depth test using the 162 ELDX. I tried three of the six depths during a previous outing with no success so I didn't expect much. Boy was I wrong.
The first iteration was the shortest remaining OAL. Shoot, let cool a bit, shoot, let cool a bit, shoot. Not bad.
That's three shots into .405".
So now what do I do? Accubond (BC .531) at 3,000 FPS or 162 ELDX (BC .631) at 3030?
It's a nice problem to have.
P
I went to the range today to confirm the precision and accuracy of this load, and took along the remains of the seating depth test using the 162 ELDX. I tried three of the six depths during a previous outing with no success so I didn't expect much. Boy was I wrong.
The first iteration was the shortest remaining OAL. Shoot, let cool a bit, shoot, let cool a bit, shoot. Not bad.
That's three shots into .405".
So now what do I do? Accubond (BC .531) at 3,000 FPS or 162 ELDX (BC .631) at 3030?
It's a nice problem to have.
P