- Messages
- 17,471
- Reactions
- 36,484
This is a SCOTUS case now.
Worth the read -
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-843.html
"Some amicus briefs argue that the "sensitive places" exception to the right to bear arms proves there is no right. After all, defensive gun carrying can be prohibited in a sensitive place, even though a person might need a firearm for defense in such a place. Therefore, the fact that people might need guns for defense in public generally does not mean that they have a right to bear arms."
Worth the read -
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-843.html
"Some amicus briefs argue that the "sensitive places" exception to the right to bear arms proves there is no right. After all, defensive gun carrying can be prohibited in a sensitive place, even though a person might need a firearm for defense in such a place. Therefore, the fact that people might need guns for defense in public generally does not mean that they have a right to bear arms."