Gold Supporter
Silver Supporter
Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 5,630
- Reactions
- 8,848
If he doesn't legally own it - he doesn't own it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does Bundy have a title or a deed to the property - if not to me he is nothing more than a squatter. To me he wants to control of a piece of property that he has no legal right to just because he and his family has had the privilege of using it for decades does not mean he has the right to use it forever. Using armed force to take over property that does belong to you is stealing in my opinion.
Since when has the government met our obligations lately?There should be a paper trail to prove he has grazing rights. If he does as stated the question becomes what type of agreement was it - a 99 year lease for example, doesnt mean he owns if after 99 years. - I don't know what the agreement was. If it is a preemptive right to property that only means that he has first right to buy the property if it comes up for sale - not that Bundy actually owns it currently. I however feel that regardless of what the money is being used for by the BLM - Bundy has no right to stop paying it. If he uses the property and started paying fees for the grazing he needs to continue as he a greed to it at one time and as he doesn't own it he is not meeting his obligations..
Ruby you're arguing/discussing the wrong end of the problem.So your saying two wrongs make it ok?
Found this report interesting... The Bunkerville Project: Glencore Xtrata & government owned gold mines... http://intellihub.com/bunkerville-project-glencore-xtrata-government-owned-gold-mines/
Unless I missed something the guy stopped paying for the right to graze cattle on property he didnt own. To simplify it, it's no different than not paying rent on the house you live in, no rent payment, no more get to live there. If you have more cattle than you can support on your own land you pay to graze them somewhere else, whether it's your neighbor or the government.
Ruby you're arguing/discussing the wrong end of the problem.
This transcends turtle vs. cattle, red vs. blue, lib vs. consv, etc…it has to do with the selling off of American sovereignty!
You're argument as to whether Bundys' eminent domain stance is applicable and legal, is a moot point.
When hired thugs invade a mans livelihood (and I doubt he's rich) with guns, armor and threats, it becomes a constitutional argument!
Will
This x1000, I guess if you don't/refuse to pay taxes they everyone would be alright with 200 armed and geared up IRS Agents blocking off roads to your house, setting up first amendment zones and pushing down pregnant woman and cancer survivors and implementing no fly zones over your house and spending 3 times as much money as than what is owed in order to get their money, in the name of "justice" and getting "whats theirs."
.