Gold Supporter
- Messages
- 24,559
- Reactions
- 37,250
- Thread Starter
- #41
All I can say to that is wow. Thanks for being honest.Nope.
We have reasonable limits on all rights. Same for the second amendment sir or madam.
We have a complex, tried and true system of laws regarding guns. We have things that are protected And things that are not protected. Pistols, rifles and shotguns are protected. Machine guns are not.
There are only really two issues in discussion at the moment.
Is there a right to carry outside the home ?(there should be) And are assault weapons protected? (they should be)
That is where the fight is. Not the age at which someone can buy a gun.
That argument is bubblegunerbation.
If there is not a right to have a pistol at 18, and the Supreme Court found years ago there was not, then the same logic and law would be able to be applied here.
That sir or madam is what you sign up for when you say you support the Constitution. The Supreme Court interpretation IS the law of the land and it is YOU that is on the slippery slope when you deny that because THAT is exactly what the liberals do. They think that the parts they like apply and the rest does not. That sir or madam is sophistry and the basis of totalitarianism.
I believe in the Constitution and it's Supreme Court interpretations. That makes me an American. I support our laws not some tarted up pig in a dress of a fantasy of what rights should be.
Sir or madam, I also support your right to believe what you like, but avoiding reality sounds more like an antifa wet dream to me than a real plan of action.
And no I don't trust 18 year olds to vote or defend the country either FWIW.