Silver Lifetime
- Messages
- 42,864
- Reactions
- 111,357
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I edited my post to be more accurate. Natural law, look it up. Has to do with human nature. Government was only established to enforce natural law, however now its just become too "complicated" ? is that the right word?
Like when someone takes your stuff, you get defensive, protective and such. That feeling describes natural law. Now some one takes your stuff and you take it back, and then the initial "criminal" gets mad and defensive, that is where the government steps in. You don't have to be religious to participate in natural law. But like I said nowadays it's too "complicated", that's just the word were going to use for now.
How does Antifreefa fit into Natural Law.Natural law however also means the stronger/smarter dominate the weak, or the weak band together to dominate the individually strong.
Natural law has merit, but natural law, by itself, without constraints, is what we see where those who are more aggressive/strong/smart dominate those who aren't.
To violate their natural rights. Protection of natural rights is what government by the people is about.Natural law however also means the stronger/smarter dominate the weak
How does Antifreefa fit into Natural Law.
To violate their natural rights. Protection of natural rights is what government by the people is about.
No ones debating self defense or right to bear arms. As said that's a done deal, even thought seems to want to try and amend that. This conversation really got off track. Started with morals and then suddenly that turned to a debate and whatever, may have been my fault I was just trying to explain myself. So allow me to bring it back. I own several pistol braces to avoid the NFA SBR BS, now that's a series of acronyms for ya. It all branched from morals. Killing people is wrong whether you use a gun, rock, pistol brace or whatever. The reality behind it is, the firearm and whatever attachment/accessory etc was on it didn't kill anyone, triggers don't pull themselves. Magazine limiters haven't really changed anything have they? The strictest Gun control areas, have the highest gun related crimes. We all see this, we all know this, but how much longer until the "elites", see this.I made this easy to understand. You have to apply the following link to the gun control debate:
Rights, rights, and regulations | LibertyLobbyForum
AFTER we completed The Charter and Proclamation of the Rights of Man, we began getting posters that wanted to debate a document that is pretty much a done deal. Many times people underestlibertarians.freeforums.net
The Right to keep and bear Arms is an extension of your Right to Life. Self defense is the first law of nature. How many metaphors do you need? I will add to that link tonight and tie it to the Bill of Rights.
.
No ones debating self defense or right to bear arms. As said that's a done deal, even thought seems to want to try and amend that. This conversation really got off track. Started with morals and then suddenly that turned to a debate and whatever, may have been my fault I was just trying to explain myself. So allow me to bring it back. I own several pistol braces to avoid the NFA SBR BS, now that's a series of acronyms for ya. It all branched from morals. Killing people is wrong whether you use a gun, rock, pistol brace or whatever. The reality behind it is, the firearm and whatever attachment/accessory etc was on it didn't kill anyone, triggers don't pull themselves. Magazine limiters haven't really changed anything have they? The strictest Gun control areas, have the highest gun related crimes. We all see this, we all know this, but how much longer until the "elites", see this.
You're right, "see and apply" and I think were all in agreeance.That was a great summary, but the last past presupposes "the elites" don't already know all this. I presume many do, but they don't care because this isn't about safety, never has been, it's about control.
It will be interesting to see how that pans out. I smell a SCOTUS case brewing.Arizona Gov Ducey recently signed a 2nd Amendment Sanctuary bill into law & it covers the whole state, so I will feel sorry for States that hafta follow Biden's unConstitutional edicts
@Andy54Hawken is this your secret account?!I hear ya. Don't even get me started on those new-fangled semi-automatics. My motto has always been "Go muzzleloader. or go home".
It will be interesting to see how that pans out. I smell a SCOTUS case brewing.
Please cite the case where the Supreme Court of the United States ruled on the legality of Sanctuary Cities.The 2nd Amendment Sanctuary law is based on the laws made in California for their sanctuary cities--these laws have already been judged to be legal, which is why illegals in blue states don't hafta worry about being turned over to the feds, even when they have warrants
None, immigration lawyers have cited Printz vs United States (a gun rights case!) as justification; whereas the SCOTUS held the following;Please cite the case where the Supreme Court of the United States ruled on the legality of Sanctuary Cities.
ZA_Survialist's location is a moon around the planet Calpamos named LV-426 which where the Xenomorphs were from in the original Alien movie.@Andy54Hawken is this your secret account?!
Hmm, that's a rather interesting contradiction of the Supremacy Clause. Then again, the Supremacy Clause only applies to the Constitution and federal laws pursuant to it.None, immigration lawyers have cited Printz vs United States (a gun rights case!) as justification; whereas the SCOTUS held the following;
That Federal government could not compel States to enforce Federal Laws
That the 10th Amendment prohibited Federal Gov from commanding State officials directly.
"Thats it.. Game over man, game over!"ZA_Survialist's loction is a moon around the planet Calpamos named LV-426 which where the Xenomorphs were from in the original Alien movie.
I can barely keep up with my account...let alone another one....@Andy54Hawken is this your secret account?!
Please cite the case where the Supreme Court of the United States ruled on the legality of Sanctuary Cities.