Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 16,093
- Reactions
- 34,025
Lol. Hi points were just one example. Mac 10 and ingram tec models are other examples of striker fired pistols thats way heavier than needed... just because of straight blowback, not because of striker or hammer. Beretta M9 is a hammer fired gun, so is the Colt 1911A1 series, and then theres the Sig P226, also hammer fired.... really.... all those "points" has no real bearing on the fact that theres little to no real difference in reliability if based only on hammer or striker... there ARE differences if you consider locked breech, straight blowback, delayed blowback, gas operated, recoil operated and so on... whether or not the firing pin is acted by a hammer or a striker (side note; AR15s are internal hammer fired...)
There are polymer framed hammer actions yes, just as there are metal framed striker actions... and then theres straight blowback versus tilting barrel locked breech designs... I daresay that limited to tilted barrel locked breech, and polymer framed... there is no real difference in reliability or ease of learning; both require cocking by pulling slide or in some models, just hammer.... both comes with a wide variety of sights... both have variety of trigger feels.. some feel great like Single Action only (a few 1911 models), some feel crap.. some feel just the same as a Glock....
There are polymer framed hammer actions yes, just as there are metal framed striker actions... and then theres straight blowback versus tilting barrel locked breech designs... I daresay that limited to tilted barrel locked breech, and polymer framed... there is no real difference in reliability or ease of learning; both require cocking by pulling slide or in some models, just hammer.... both comes with a wide variety of sights... both have variety of trigger feels.. some feel great like Single Action only (a few 1911 models), some feel crap.. some feel just the same as a Glock....