Had a gun debate today after Obamas latest comment about gun control.

[Darkker]

It was a tongue-in-cheek reply to my post.
They haven't, just as I said in my post.
Unless a SAAMI chamber is at the VEEERRRYYY minimum, and the standard NATO ball ammo is at the VEEERRRRYYYY maximum; AND you ignore that it chambered hard, there is no problem.

 

[Stomper]

Have a cite for this, or is it just sensationalism covered with the implication of "safety"?

I've not read anything recent where a properly maintained rifle blew up from 5.56 NATO.

It was indeed a tongue in cheek reply showing that I agree with him by using a satirical approach using the most extreme result on an angle of logic that is in opposition to the position that I am supporting. In other words I'm being a supportive smart-a$$. It's sorta my thing.

 

[davemata]

Noted, I'm still feeling things out and calibrating my bs meter.

 

[Angie]

I need to note that I am a moderate democrat who hates gun control and the socialist agendas being forced on us by our current administration. I am however pro choice,pro middlechoice class and if someone is gay so what, thats their choice.

I haven't read the whole thread yet, but sounds like you need to check out the Libertarian Party platform. Seriously.

 

[Russianfist]

I haven't read the whole thread yet, but sounds like you need to check out the Libertarian Party platform. Seriously.

I like some ideas of the Libertarian party but legalizing certain drugs,free trade,minimal immigrantion laws,and minimal military action kind of kill it for me. In a perfect world where everyone played fair it would be great but we just arnt there yet IMHO.