At another site I have an argument going with people who say the congresswomen and people shot couldn't have been protected if the police had been there. So to open up points of view I offer this test so you can tell me if you think an officer would have been able to return fire and protect some of the victims in Tuscon.
Shooter is 22 and has no known skill at arms, is a doper and has a new gun. He gets close enough to open fire and hits 20 targets that are moving in panic or diving to the ground or sitting behind the table. He fires 30 rnds
After timing yourself figure out if a cop had been standing next to the Congresswoman as he should have been would lives have been saved? Point is I am angry that two Oregonians were shot in the massacre. Cops should have been there. Could they have stopped some of the killing?
jj
Shooter is 22 and has no known skill at arms, is a doper and has a new gun. He gets close enough to open fire and hits 20 targets that are moving in panic or diving to the ground or sitting behind the table. He fires 30 rnds
After timing yourself figure out if a cop had been standing next to the Congresswoman as he should have been would lives have been saved? Point is I am angry that two Oregonians were shot in the massacre. Cops should have been there. Could they have stopped some of the killing?
jj