gun test lol

Discussion in 'General Firearm Discussion' started by Just Jim, Jan 15, 2011.

  1. Just Jim

    Just Jim Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,828
    Likes Received:
    6,271
    At another site I have an argument going with people who say the congresswomen and people shot couldn't have been protected if the police had been there. So to open up points of view I offer this test so you can tell me if you think an officer would have been able to return fire and protect some of the victims in Tuscon.

    Shooter is 22 and has no known skill at arms, is a doper and has a new gun. He gets close enough to open fire and hits 20 targets that are moving in panic or diving to the ground or sitting behind the table. He fires 30 rnds

    After timing yourself figure out if a cop had been standing next to the Congresswoman as he should have been would lives have been saved? Point is I am angry that two Oregonians were shot in the massacre. Cops should have been there. Could they have stopped some of the killing?

    jj
     
  2. mjbskwim

    mjbskwim
    Salmon,Idaho
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    11,576
    Likes Received:
    10,118
    I'm afraid to say it,but I think there may have been some friendly fire,kind of a melee going on if there wasn't a cop right next to the guy.

    I read an article about a bank robber who went into a bank and killed three people with one shot each.
    They asked him if he had training.He said no.He just pointed and shot.
    That can happen ,I guess,since the drugged gunman is fairly relaxed.

    I can't believe there wasn't some type of official security.That just seems stupid.
     
  3. The Cheese

    The Cheese
    somewhere special
    Member

    Messages:
    738
    Likes Received:
    17
    Even a plain clothes officer or 2. Wouldn't have taken much. Would have looked like business as usual, little security. At the very least a couple lives could have possibly been saved if the officers were close enough. There is a lot of if's in this kind of speculation, but I am sure have at least one or 2 security personal there, uniformed or otherwise, would have been better than none at all
     
  4. buick455

    buick455
    se portland
    Member

    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    22
    NOT to knock the cops but most of them spend less time practicing with their guns than we do. What I wish was that a couple of citizens with CCW's would have been there then some of this tragedy could have been avoided and without cost (our tax dollers) for armed security, either we want to pay for cops and security to follow all our reps all the time or we don't. Bet this wouldn't have happened like this at a Ron Paul Ralley.
     
  5. Just Jim

    Just Jim Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,828
    Likes Received:
    6,271
    It was Pima countries area yet no officers were there to protect a Congresswoman and a judge though the Sheriff says he knew there was alot of political hate going on. Would there have been less killing if an officer was on each side of her watching the crowd?

    jj
     
  6. eriknemily

    eriknemily
    Tillamook County (Cheese!)
    Member

    Messages:
    779
    Likes Received:
    22
    Or would the cops have been the first shot? Remember the cops shot in Washington last year. I think they should just make it a crime to shoot people. That that'll stop all this ;)
     
  7. clearconscience

    clearconscience
    Vancouver, WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,303
    Likes Received:
    9,260
    I tend to disagree.
    I think the presence of Officers plain clothes or uniform woul have made a difference. Officers may not have been able to old west style draw and fire ending all the tragedy, but officers to have quick reflexes and possibly could have jumped the guy, grabbed the gun, or at least one could have drawn his weapon and fired before the wacky got even a few shots off. Maybe it would have urged the shooter to shoot the cops first, if one cop goes down the other would have reacted, maybe giving him enough time to get a shot off.
    I know that the shooter could have gotten 10 shots of by the time one could draw a gun, but it's less likely with a inexperienced gunner. IF, I do say If the cops were on their toes. Which might not have been the case in a lot of instances.
    Either way the chances of the shooter killing 6 people or harming 13 would have been lowered.
    It still boggles my mind why a congress person would be in public without armed security. Especially in a state with such high controversy over the last couple years.
     
  8. andreys21

    andreys21
    Milwaukie, OR
    Active Member

    Messages:
    378
    Likes Received:
    67
    I believe there should be some kind of security force present at any gathering where a politician or a high profile person present or speaking. I always understood that there was always some security present but I guess I was wrong.
     
  9. mjbskwim

    mjbskwim
    Salmon,Idaho
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    11,576
    Likes Received:
    10,118
    Are you using your Dad's account?
    Seriously
    It is a crime to shoot people,but that does not deter murderers at the least.
     
  10. pokerace

    pokerace
    Newberg
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,293
    Likes Received:
    755
    I don't think police would have helped. If any thing there would have been more dead.(friendly fire)
     
  11. mattg521

    mattg521
    portland.,or
    Member

    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    17
    And here I was thinking he was being facetious.
     
  12. Swedish K

    Swedish K
    SW Washington
    Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    1,967
    Likes Received:
    1,304
    are you contradicting one of my favorite t-shirts? "Some people are alive simply because its illegal to kill them"

    While I believe that more armed citizens or a security detail may have reduced the death/injury count, I cant help but wonder if there would be a higher body count because of mistaken identity shootings. Say a dozen or more of the citizens in the crowd were packing, the bad guy starts shooting and one or two respond quickly shooting the bad guy, others in the crowd are slower to react and by the time they decide to pull their gun to defend others they engage the first person with a gun in the area the shooting started mistakenly thinking that they were part of the assault. Not saying it would happen that way but mistakes like that could happen.
     
  13. mjbskwim

    mjbskwim
    Salmon,Idaho
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    11,576
    Likes Received:
    10,118
    Well I can't spell that word and my mom doesn't like me saying it
     
  14. Mark W.

    Mark W.
    Silverton, OR
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    5,982
    Likes Received:
    5,554
    but his gun shot hundreds of rounds a min how could they defend against that?






    and for those of you in the Bud tonight that was sarcasm
     
  15. salmonriverjohn

    salmonriverjohn
    N.W Oregon coast, Gods country
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,441
    Likes Received:
    5,453
    :thumbup:

    Exactly what I was thinking, there are no signs saying "I'm a good guy" on their shirts. Initial reports stated there were two shooters. It would be a very hard decision to make. Then suppose you draw and dispatch the bad guy,,, and become the next target yourself, it could turn into a far worse situation real quick. One may be able to ascertain the original shooter, but once that's accomplished and other weapons are drawn?? I'm just saying.
     
  16. The Quiet Man

    The Quiet Man
    rural Washington County, Oregon
    Active Member

    Messages:
    385
    Likes Received:
    39
    Why? Is a politician's or high profile person's life worth more than yours? Is security automatically provided when you go someplace?
     
  17. Just Jim

    Just Jim Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,828
    Likes Received:
    6,271
    I believe if the police had been there they may have saved some civilian lives. The sheriffs department wasn't there and blamed talk radio and Sarah Palin for the shooting. Guess they needed to point fingers to hide their own responsibility.

    jj
     
  18. ak56

    ak56
    Carnation, Wa
    Active Member

    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    47
    +1
     
  19. Just Jim

    Just Jim Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,828
    Likes Received:
    6,271
    Good point, then why carry a gun at all?

    jj
     
  20. The Quiet Man

    The Quiet Man
    rural Washington County, Oregon
    Active Member

    Messages:
    385
    Likes Received:
    39
    If the police where everywhere, there would be very little crime. But they haven't ever been, aren't, and never will be everywhere. The police (or any government "authority") are NOT responsible for the safety of individuals. You are responsible for your own safety just as everyone else is. The same goes for politicians and "high profile persons" with very few exceptions.
     

Share This Page