Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A study was done and when asking murderers if they "considered the death penalty" before committing there act? The reply was a resounding no!
It doesn't change the fact they'll have to deal with it after. Regardless if they were for it or not.
True. It also depends on the crime. If you commit a white collar felony you stand a much better chance of getting your gun rights back than if it is a felony that was committed involving the use of a firearm.
The whole idea behind the death penalty is to prevent crime, if perpetrators do not consider it before committing the act then it is worthless.
If you were convicted of a felony involving a firearm, assault, or DV you will permanently loose your A2 rights. That goes for all A class felonies too. C class felonies are a 5 year wait and B class are 10. That is after your released from parole or probation and have not gotten in any more legal trouble. This is all for WA state though
I'm a little confused about this from the get go. Since when is an ex-con, recently put on the street, deemed "paid in full" on his debts for his crimes? Do we no longer have parole or probation? Since the debt is paid, what right does the judicial system have to even bring up a prior record? By the same token, after an 8 year stint in prison, I'm sure you wouldn't mind a "reformed" child molester hanging out at your 7 year olds school because, after all, his debt was repaid the instant his sentence was complete. There are ways to get your rights back if you want to jump through hoops. And if you burned that bridge, then pissed all over the ashes, so be it. Another great effect of the Nanny State. You can sneak in the country and steal funding, you can be a sexual deviant or you can be just released from prison and in all those cases, not only should I pay 30% tax to pay for it all, I should owe you an apology for my "intolerance".
We already know that the death penalty is flawed and innocent men have been murdered by the state, and that somewhere above 60 have been completely proven innocent and released from prison and some from death row.
A study was done and when asking murderers if they "considered the death penalty" before committing there act? The reply was a resounding no!
The whole idea behind the death penalty is to prevent crime, if perpetrators do not consider it before committing the act then it is worthless.
If we don't trust the government to control who can possess firearms, why do we trust them with the power to execute people?
Seems like everything is a felony these days, and if not is somehow construed as a form of domestic violence. I can't believe no one has addressed the fact that in most cases, people do not even have to be convicted of something to lose their rights - just charged with. Charged with, found innocent, and then still have to go through the process to have things stricken from their record to clear their name. I am going off the assumption that this state is the same as others I have lived in, apologies if I am wrong.....I'm no lawyer nor do I play one on t.v. lol
Like this little kid???
Hercules Family Battles Sex Assault Claim Against 6-Year-Old « CBS San Francisco
Like this little kid???
Hercules Family Battles Sex Assault Claim Against 6-Year-Old « CBS San Francisco
Because one is a Constitutional right they cannot have power over according to the 2nd while the other is a time honored way to eliminate the worst bad actors from our society
Again, its not that I have anything against the death penalty used to execute criminals (I do), it's that I believe a government with the ability to execute its own citizens is more dangerous than criminals.
I would like to see some reliable statistics that back that claim up.
Stalin and the then Commie Russians.
Just one example, Katyn massacre