Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 5,802
- Reactions
- 6,752
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ya know, the time spent typing and posting that you coulda just googled it in under 6 words... instead of waiting or asking for someone to do it for ya.Does someone have a version of this that does not mean watching a video? Something with a link to what going on?
I had no idea what I was supposed to be looking for but I see you had to carve out time to complain.Ya know, the time spent typing and posting that you coulda just googled it in under 6 words... instead of waiting or asking for someone to do it for ya.
NY Congresswoman Seeks to Outlaw Civilian Body Armor - The Truth About Guns
◀Previous Post Next Post▶ In more anti-everything wackiness from the Empire State, New York Democratic Congresswoman Grace Meng apparently wants to make it easier for criminals to shoot you. Meng has reintroduced legislation – for the third time – that would ban civilian body armor if it...www.thetruthaboutguns.com
Said the pot to the kettle... not once but twice... with no meaningful input added in either post(?)I had no idea what I was supposed to be looking for but I see you had to carve out time to complain.
Yup. The argument that LE attempting to use a taser or trying to put someone down can be ineffective when someone is wearing body armor, but then again, just recently, if Airman Fortson had been wearing a vest he would likely still be alive today. Getting put down for answering the door to your own home?? Or the poor woman just a few weeks prior that reported a burglary in progress and got hit 5 times in her own home when 2 cops mag dumped through the front of her house??The only reason to object to someone having armor is if you intend them harm...
Now that I see what the "sky is falling" was all about it was a big yawn to me. This is why I no longer will click links to YT video like this. Some stupid click bait headline, takes me to a video of someone trying to sell me some crap, only to tell me to panic over nothing. People have been beating this drum since before Al invented the net. The law makers have managed to scare the people who sell it a couple times but even that was short lived. The one good one was after those clowns caused the huge shoot'm'up in LA who were wearing armor. For a short time after that Galls was "hesitant" to sell the stuff to the general public. It did not seem to last long. I know a LONG time ago some states passed laws that criminals could not own body armor. In a way this seemed like maybe a good idea to me. That way if the scum get shot they may die faster.The only reason to object to someone having armor is if you intend them harm...
I tend to agree. Just like firearms... if a person is of the criminal type that misuses something for nefarious purposes they are choosing to have their right to them curtailed.Convicted violent crims are one thing... then again if someone isn't rehabilitated to a point they can be trusted to walk the streets with iron, they shouldn't be out at all.
Remember when being sentenced to Life meant LIFE?
Damn, when you say it, sometimes it's even scarier.It isn't stupid if you are the government; the PTB do not want to govern the populace, they want to RULE the populace. If you want to rule, then you must remove any means for the ruled to defend themselves against any force you may wish to employ to keep them in line. This includes armor.
From the perspective of the PTB - this makes perfect sense. Gun control is not about our safety, it is about the safety of the rulers. Ditto for armor.
View attachment 1887357
Ya know, the time spent typing and posting that you coulda just googled it in under 6 words... instead of waiting or asking for someone to do it for ya.
NY Congresswoman Seeks to Outlaw Civilian Body Armor - The Truth About Guns
◀Previous Post Next Post▶ In more anti-everything wackiness from the Empire State, New York Democratic Congresswoman Grace Meng apparently wants to make it easier for criminals to shoot you. Meng has reintroduced legislation – for the third time – that would ban civilian body armor if it...www.thetruthaboutguns.com
It isn't stupid if you are the government; the PTB do not want to govern the populace, they want to RULE the populace. If you want to rule, then you must remove any means for the ruled to defend themselves against any force you may wish to employ to keep them in line. This includes armor.
From the perspective of the PTB - this makes perfect sense. Gun control is not about our safety, it is about the safety of the rulers. Ditto for armor.
View attachment 1887357
You must have an amazing memory, because if you remember those times, you must be really OLD.I too remember when sentences used to mean something and actually worked as a deterrent.
I wouldn't say it is just democrats.In short: democrats don't want the citizenry to have guns, or body armor, but smoking/snorting whatever is totally fine (S evidenced in Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, etc.)
Gee, if only history could explain to us what happens over time when a population is disarmed and left at the mercy of that government…
While I understand politicians in general suck - When republicans propose the bills or vote in favor of the ones democrats do, let me know. Otherwise it's BS to try and paint them all with the same brush. If democrats didn't propose these bills, we wouldn't have them.I wouldn't say it is just democrats.
I suspect that most of the GOP politicians are either silent on 2A issues, or they only profess support for it to protect their position, and usually only when it comes time to vote on legislation or answer a question on their position - maybe during a speech during election times, but are otherwise silent.
I further suspect that most actually have strong feelings about it and that at least some would wish the issue would go away.
And we are not getting near the same number or frequency really, of pro2A bills being proposed from the Republican side oh yes. What happened to Hearing Protection Act...While I understand politicians in general suck - When republicans propose the bills or vote in favor of the ones democrats do, let me know. Otherwise it's BS to try and paint them all with the same brush. If democrats didn't propose these bills, we wouldn't have them.
As someone who has experienced several right infringements surrounding firearms in my lifetime, they have 100% come from democrat bills and politicians.