JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Maybe it IS (or NOT)..... just better to go to the full SCOTUS at this point?


Aloha, Mark
That's what this means. The CRPA is going to make an interlocutory appeal to the USSC.

The process is first they appeal to Kagan, as it's her assigned region. If she does not intervene, that is not the end. They can then go to ANY member of the USSC who can then intervene. And it's a very safe bet one of them will take that appeal up and cut 9th C out. The unprecedented and alarming dissents make that much more likely.
 
BUT, But, but.....doesn't the SCOTUS have a lot on their plate already?


Well IMHO.....they could have/should have been answering theses questions a long time ago.

Aloha, Mark
 


The decision said:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
Judgment is entered for Plaintiffs. The Attorney General respectfully requests a stay of any judgment in Plaintiffs' favor for a sufficient period to seek a stay from the Court of Appeals. That request is granted. Therefore, the enforcement of the injunction is hereby stayed for ten (10) days.

The following permanent injunction will be entered:

1. Defendant Attorney General Rob Bonta, and his officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with him, and those duly sworn state peace officers and federal law enforcement officers who gain knowledge of this injunction order or know of the existence of this injunction order, are enjoined from implementing or enforcing California Penal Code §§ 30515(a)(1) through (8) (defining an "assault weapon" by prohibited features), 30800 (deeming those "assault weapons" a public nuisance), 30915 (regulating those "assault weapons" obtained by bequest or inheritance), 30945 (restricting use of registered "assault weapons"), and the penalty provisions §§ 30600, 30605 and 30800 as applied to" assault weapons" defined in Code §§ 30515(a)(1) through (8).

2. Defendant Rob Bonta shall provide, by personal service or otherwise, actual notice of this order to all law enforcement personnel who are responsible for implementing or enforcing the enjoined statute.

3. This injunction is stayed for ten (10) days from the date of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 19, 2023
____________________________________
HON. ROGER T. BENITEZ
Senior United States District Judge
 
Last Edited:
Hence why I have a friend in Cali who refers to Newsom as Mousseum
I think it's that "hard wax" they use for snow skis.
FF02C2D9-FB2A-4803-AA31-0CA5A40FB929.jpeg
 
RE : Hi Cap Magazines.
Does it mean that OR and WA will also follow?

Cough, cough.....
Nah......they like being Unconstitutional.

Aloha, Mark

PS.....RE : The Miller Case
For the lazy.....start at 00:51.

 
Last Edited:
For those of you who like Four Boxes Diner.


Aloha, Mark
Interesting twist that they may not be able to stack the court with the same 11 judges by calling it a "comeback case". If that's true, then this one could have a different outcome than the mag ban case when CA tries to get an "emergency stay" on it. VERY interesting twist.
 
Inevitable but also possibly good. Arguments are December, which puts a spring decision. That clears the way for a possible fall hearing by SCOTUS.

The argument that SCOTUS won't touch it is a risk, but I think Thomas and Alito are done playing. I think if the Ninth continues to be the Ninth, Daddy is gonna get out the paddle.
 

Upcoming Events

Oregon Arms Collectors April 2024 Gun Show
Portland, OR
Centralia Gun Show
Centralia, WA
Albany Gun Show
Albany, OR
Falcon Gun Show - Classic Gun & Knife Show
Stanwood, WA
Wes Knodel Gun & Knife Show - Albany
Albany, OR

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top