Can you say hypocrite?

[Slowpoke]

<broken link removed>

Read More

 

[fd15k]

There is nothing wrong with that. Children of high profile politicians are high value targets for terrorists.

 

[mcathcart]

There is nothing wrong with that. Children are high value targets.

fyp

 

[Jamie6.5]

There is nothing wrong with that. Children of high profile politicians are high value targets for terrorists.

You say (type) that as if you believe that absolves him of his hypocrisy.

When he comes out in favor of the NRA's suggestion to put armed guards in all public schools, I'll let him off the hook.
Currently, he seems to be convinced that disarming legal gun owners is the answer, while his kids are protected by trained professionals with guns.
The very definition of elitist hypocrisy.

 

[eganx]

There is nothing wrong with that. Children of high profile politicians are high value targets for terrorists.

Really, because I feel my son is of equal value to Obama's children.

 

[parallax]

I'm sure pierce morgan also has body guards, but would be the first to say that u.s. citizens should not be allowed to own guns.

 

[fd15k]

Really, because I feel my son is of equal value to Obama's children.

To you he is of equal or greater value. To the nation he is irrelevant.

 

[fd15k]

I'm sure pierce morgan also has body guards, but would be the first to say that u.s. citizens should not be allowed to own guns.

Would be interesting to know if that's the case. Care to find some citations ?

 

[trainsktg]

There is nothing wrong with that. Children of high profile politicians are high value targets for terrorists.

Apparently so are middle class school children.

Keith

 

[trainsktg]

To you he is of equal or greater value. To the nation he is irrelevant.

Welcome to the Ignore List.

Keith

 

[oknow]

To you he is of equal or greater value. To the nation he is irrelevant.

obummers kids are irrelevant to me and a lot of other people of the nation sooooo

 

[Jamie6.5]

To you he is of equal or greater value. To the nation he is irrelevant.

Until the nation's political left wants to use the possibility of his death to disarm the rest of us.
Then he's worth every semi-auto and high-cap mag ever built.
Along with the gun rights of everyone that owns them.

 

[pokerace]

Some interesting news has broken in the wake of the latest push for gun control by President Obama and Senate Democrats: Obama sends his kids to a school where armed guards are used as a matter of fact.

The school, Sidwell Friends School in Washington, DC, has 11 security officers and is seeking to hire a new police officer as we speak.

If you dismiss this by saying, "Of course they have armed guards -- they get Secret Service protection," then you've missed the larger point.

The larger point is that this is standard operating procedure for the school, period. And this is the reason people like NBC's David Gregory send their kids to Sidwell, they know their kids will be protected from the carnage that befell kids at a school where armed guards weren't used (and weren't even allowed).

Shame on President Obama for seeking more gun control and for trying to prevent the parents of other school children from doing what he has clearly done for his own. His children sit under the protection guns afford, while the children of regular Americans are sacrificed.


<broken link removed>

 

[DMax]

 

[oknow]

Yea he's a hypocrite so what's new all the polluteticans calling for gun control have armed guards until they have to follow the same standards they pass for the American people it will be that way ( which is wrong )

 

[longcolt]

The well known think their visibility makes them a special target. Its not the same for us common folks.

 

[timac]

There is nothing wrong with that. Children of high profile politicians are high value targets for terrorists.

You must not value your children or family.

Innocent children and adults are all targets of terrorism and evil in general. They should all be protected, not just the SOCIAL ELITE. The common man protects himself and family with what he has available, possibly the gun.

The SOCIAL ELITE do protect themselves with the gun.

 

[mjbskwim]

When did you ever start thinking that you children were as special as a TV celebrities children?

 

[locobob]

There is nothing wrong with that. Children of high profile politicians are high value targets for terrorists.

Yep... but there is also nothing wrong with protecting your own children with a gun.

 

[Stomper]

There is nothing wrong with that. Children of high profile politicians are high value targets for terrorists.

... and the rest of our young citizens (and their families) can go hang, as they continue to be ALLOWED to be targeted by criminally diabolical and/or insane individuals... because it fits the political elite's agenda of attempting to disarm the general population by refusing to do the obvious thing needed to protect the public that they swore an oath to do.

To you he is of equal or greater value. To the nation he is irrelevant.

So, ATM I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt on that statement, and ask you to clarify your point. Are you talking "irrelevant" to the politicians, pop-culture, your own feelings, what?