Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally I believe they were cut down 14.5 Colt barrels. I have a Colt with a 10.3" upper cut from a 6920 from ADCO. It's pretty awesome and runs flawless.
Not to get too nit picky, but no Mk18's were built by Colt.
Mod 0 was LMT.
The Mod 1 is built by Daniel Defense.
Both mated to existing Colt lowers.
The accessories are unit based, depending on their version of the SOPMOD kit.
Just because it is an SBR AR, doesn't make it a Mk18. One of the below is a Mk18 Mod 0. The rest are just SBR's.
[/URL]
Not to get too nit picky, but no Mk18's were built by Colt.
Mod 0 was LMT.
The Mod 1 is built by Daniel Defense.
Both mated to existing Colt lowers.
The accessories are unit based, depending on their version of the SOPMOD kit.
Just because it is an SBR AR, doesn't make it a Mk18. One of the below is a Mk18 Mod 0. The rest are just SBR's.
#4 is the Mod 0. Being a bit picky but the stock, rear sight and light are incorrect but a very nice looking rifle.
Yeah. I know. The rail is not correct to the Mod 0 document either. Or the pistol grip. Or the BE Meyers flash hider for the KAC QD suppressor. Or the X200 light (or the pressure switch either for that matter). Or the ladder type rail covers.
When they asked for my input on the Requirements Document for procurement, they asked for input. Didn't mean they were going to take it. Just because "design by committee" makes the bean counters happy doesn't mean people have to follow the final spec sheet to the letter or blindly use what was handed to them.
100% of the guys I know who have picked up a current configuration, brand new Mk18, built the spec sheet, grumbles and starts raping their old gun of the parts & accessories that suit their needs. Specs written on a sheet of paper by REMF's & Civilians rarely, if ever, satisfy the actual requirements of the end user.