yup, thats the whole point of this rule.Then the question is, why would I buy a serialized 80% and have to do all the work if I could get a done lower!? I guess this is the goal?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yup, thats the whole point of this rule.Then the question is, why would I buy a serialized 80% and have to do all the work if I could get a done lower!? I guess this is the goal?
Precisely! In many cases you're really not saving much money by building your own either so their appeal will plummet. Not to mention they will likely see a big price bump as well once supplier are forced to pass on the additional costs they incure due to lincensing, the tooling and additional paperwork generated because of it to the end user.Then the question is, why would I buy a serialized 80% and have to do all the work if I could get a done lower!? I guess this is the goal?
this is why I think its interesting they didnt outright rule against the kits, just the sales/transfers of the kits. They dont directly address the 0% builds, or essentially 3D printing, but they were after the ease of the 80% kits since it doesnt take much investment to build one. A rule against the kits themselves would get shot down in court, I think...Yup. Only if you were to sell a home build as I read it. And then, I don't know if it really only impacts sales directly to an FFL or private party transfers, too.
That would be funny if you had to do a BCG to purchase a 3D printer, but then again... I bet my great grandpap was crackin jokes around the fireplace with his buddies about how ludacris it would be if you had to pass a BGC to buy an ol' shotty off a buddy. We allowed THAT to happen!
But that ignores the simple fact that in many states firearms can be transferred without the involvement of a FFL, which essentially makes them untraceable.yup, thats the whole point of this rule.
ALL "gun control" is done is small steps. Been like this for longer than I have been alive because it works. Every new law they come up state or federal, is another compromise. Gun owners go along with every singe one with the idea that they are "ok". Every new law is ignored by criminals so they do nothing to lower crime. So the same people come back and say "we just need one more law". Gun owners line up and gripe, then vote for the people doing it. There are ZERO gun laws that accomplish anything when the criminals caught are just let loose again. The laws are not supposed to do anything other than move closer to what they really want.But that ignores the simple fact that in many states firearms can be transferred without the involvement of a FFL, which essentially makes them untraceable.
Those are state laws on used guns private sales the feds cant do anything about. Isnt it already a federal law on new guns regardless of state laws?But that ignores the simple fact that in many states firearms can be transferred without the involvement of a FFL, which essentially makes them untraceable.
In those states it would keep current non-serialized as untraceable in private party sales, but would prevent any new untraceables from entering the market. Although... in private party sales that don't require an FFL... it makes them no more traceable than any exisiting serialized firearm from being, for all intents and purposes, no longer traceable from an evidentiary stand-point.But that ignores the simple fact that in many states firearms can be transferred without the involvement of a FFL, which essentially makes them untraceable.
Hmm... I've never seen or heard of that guy before. Pretty impressive presentation. Thanks for the share.
Wouldn't be surprised if some people tried to push that. Other countries already regulate the ownership of "critical parts" such as bolts or barrels to the same extent as a frame or receiver. Would be hard to do that here because parts are so widespread so perhaps they'd start by applying that only to current/future manufactured parts.How long will it be until BCGs, barrels and triggers are serialized?
Look up National Firearms Act 1938.How long will it be until BCGs, barrels and triggers are serialized?
Think UN Small Arms Treaty, which I understand Brandon has signed or is planning on signing…Wouldn't be surprised if some people tried to push that. Other countries already regulate the ownership of "critical parts" such as bolts or barrels to the same extent as a frame or receiver. Would be hard to do that here because parts are so widespread so perhaps they'd start by applying that only to current/future manufactured parts.
Indeed.The two party system sadly doesn't work well if one isn't a single-issue voter.
(28) Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin & Wyoming.Those are state laws on used guns private sales the feds cant do anything about. Isnt it already a federal law on new guns regardless of state laws?
I cant recall, how many states are left that allow private sales without FFL?