- Messages
- 424
- Reactions
- 45
With all due respects......BS. They did exactly the same thing just worded it different. The law says they don't have the authority. I'll take the law.
Good luck!
Good luck!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's cool. What you're missing is also explained in the ruling. There is a difference between administrative rules in regards to firearms and policies in regards to administration of property. Per that court ruling the first ones they can't do as they're preempted, but the second ones they can do, and that's what they've done this time.
With all due respects......BS. They did exactly the same thing just worded it different. The law says they don't have the authority. I'll take the law.
Good luck!
So, how is a challenge likely to be initiated, by someone being arrested for trespass and appealing their conviction, or by someone being kicked off the campus and challenging the policy in civil court? Or is there another avenue?
So, how is a challenge likely to be initiated, by someone being arrested for trespass and appealing their conviction, or by someone being kicked off the campus and challenging the policy in civil court? Or is there another avenue?
Since you believe the law supports your position, would you personally enter a campus building or attend a sporting event with a concealed weapon? What would you do if your weapon was noticed and you were asked to leave ?