Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can't comment on the gun AB used, I'm still trying to find strong evidence of its make and manufacture date.my understanding is that unless the prop was modified to remove the trigger bar, dropping the hammer without the trigger depressed wont fire the gun
Lets ALL hope so...An interesting analysis of the recent reenactment video.
All part of the "rehabilitation" process. Referring back to my post at #1596.Alec is only partially to blame, I heard that one on NBC.
Haaa
Did whoever say this mention who/what else was was the 'other part' of the blame?Alec is only partially to blame, I heard that one on NBC.
The gun of courseDid whoever say this mention who/what else was was the 'other part' of the blame?
Forgot to include the ammo manufacturerThe gun of course
All it would take is a report published/leaked from the CSI tech scientist that handles gun tests like ballistics etc. Remember the St. Louis couple waving guns at BLM that claimed one of the guns was not even functional... yeah, that one was tested by the appropriate officials. I thought such investigation to be a normal part of investigating any gun incident/murder. He's claiming the gun was at fault... that HAS to be investigated properly, not some "ad hoc" session with a random SAA revolver in the DA's office byWe could all put this to rest if a competent hobbyist or better could spend 5min with the gun.
That is "partially" correct... in that there is plenty of BLAME to go around. But the final, and greater, responsibility lies with the man that fired the fatal shot.Alec is only partially to blame, I heard that one on NBC.
Haaa
Unless they want to sue the maker of the live round, which is probably not known, the armorers typically make their own dummy rounds, these may have been provided by either Hannah's dad or a vendor... so another person(s) to add to the list of people to sue. However, if the shells are still in the gun, trademarks on the brass would indeed give them a target. (I wonder what the chain of custody has been on the murder weapon!)Forgot to include the ammo manufacturer
It was stated months ago that an outfit made the dummies and supplied them.Unless they want to sue the maker of the live round, which is probably not known, the armorers typically make their own dummy rounds, these may have been provided by either Hannah's dad or a vendor... so another person(s) to add to the list of people to sue. However, if the shells are still in the gun, trademarks on the brass would indeed give them a target. (I wonder what the chain of custody has been on the murder weapon!)
Baldy's attny. crafted that press release after others on set claimed that one gun had fired without the trigger being pulled twice already. Remember early on half the crew walked off the set because of two negligent discharges and Baldy [ the producer] would not do anything about it.The attorneys really need to hammer the facts of that S.A. pistol firing with Baldy's finger pressing the trigger, not a similar pistol, but the actual pistol he shot her with! They need to bring in several expert's to show that the only way that pistol fired was with Baldy holding the trigger and thumbing the hammer back and then releasing it! This is all on top of that pistol being loaded with live ammo and baldy not checking, playing around with a gun, especially one he didn't check first! They need to hammer the 4 Cardinal rules as well, and how baldy violated all of them in his ignorance/arrogance!
I doubt that is the case, in over 100 years of making movies how many have been killed with live ammo in a prop gun? They have set rules for movie guns, and they are not the same for guns you and I carry.Negative Ghostrider, I shoot somebody with my gun and that is all on me.
Makes zero difference who touched that gun before me.