Silver Supporter
Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 4,210
- Reactions
- 6,918
can't recall. this incident occ 15-20 yrs ago? Relatively famous actor, too.What was the gun ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
can't recall. this incident occ 15-20 yrs ago? Relatively famous actor, too.What was the gun ?
I vehemently disagree.Been beaten to death; the 4 rules do not apply on a film set. This is a special place where gun like objects are pointed at others and triggers are pulled because that is what is needed to capture a fantasy scene for film. It is up to the production team (not the actors!) to ensure that this can be done with 100% confidence and safety, and that is why an armorer is employed. They are the person/team dedicated to making sure that every firearm (or firearm like prop) is configure in such a way that it cannot hurt anyone during the scene for which it was configured. In a properly run set, and for the props they are responsible for, their word is law.
Google suggests Brandon Lee on the set of "The Crow"What was the gun ?
Well you are disagreeing with an extensive history, dozens and dozens of well produced, well regarded and classic movies, and hundreds or even thousands of professionals who know way more about the topic than any of us here. If they say they have another rule set that keeps people safe on sets (when followed!) I am going to trust that they got it right. They do have a pretty impressive catalog to back that up.I vehemently disagree.
The '4 rules' apply anytime and everywhere; ALWAYS.
.44 MagnumWhat was the gun ?
Except when James Arness and Arvo Ojala walked out into the street.I vehemently disagree.
The '4 rules' apply anytime and everywhere; ALWAYS.
That's the caliber not the gun used on a different dumb actor incident. What was the gun Baldwin had?.44 Magnum
John Erik-Hexum
On October 12, 1984, the cast and crew of Cover Up were filming the seventh episode of the series, "Golden Opportunity", on Stage 18 of the 20th Century Fox lot. One of the scenes filmed that day called for Hexum's character to load cartridges into a .44 Magnum handgun, so he was provided with a functional gun and blanks. When the scene did not play as the director wanted it to in the master shot, there was a delay in filming. Hexum became restless and impatient during the delay and began playing around to lighten the mood. He had unloaded all but one (blank) round, spun it, and—simulating Russian roulette—he put the revolver to his right temple and pulled the trigger, unaware of the danger.[9]
That's it! Brandon Lee's death was a bit weird, and not well-explained, but illustrates that functional firearms are (most) often also the blank-firing guns on a movie set..44 Magnum
John Erik-Hexum
On October 12, 1984, the cast and crew of Cover Up were filming the seventh episode of the series, "Golden Opportunity", on Stage 18 of the 20th Century Fox lot. One of the scenes filmed that day called for Hexum's character to load cartridges into a .44 Magnum handgun, so he was provided with a functional gun and blanks. When the scene did not play as the director wanted it to in the master shot, there was a delay in filming. Hexum became restless and impatient during the delay and began playing around to lighten the mood. He had unloaded all but one (blank) round, spun it, and—simulating Russian roulette—he put the revolver to his right temple and pulled the trigger, unaware of the danger.[9]
Not a perfect storm at all. A long sh!t show of gross negligence where unintended discharges happened on set before and people complained about it, which Baldwin ignored. It's no wonder that live rounds were found in the gun, in 2 different bandoliers the actors wore, and in the blanks box.The facts as I understand them, is that Baldwin was doing a dry-run rehearsal on cocking the gun. I wasn't familiar with the colt 45 single action army, so had to do some research. From what I gather, the firing pin rests on the primer of the round if the chamber below it is loaded..not good. Hickock did a good video explaing how back in the day, most people would load only 5 rounds.
The gun has a half cock, which allows the cylinder to turn, and a full cock which allows the trigger to be fully pulled hence firing the round.
Baldwin says he didn't "pull". the trigger. I tend to believe him. But I believe he did have his finger applying pressure to it, which allowed the sear to disengage..prior to pulling the hammer back. Here's a demo of how the gun could have fired. Fast forward to 13:16.
I agree that's what happened. Unbeknownst to Baldwin, a live round was in that chamber. In my mind the responsibility lies in the armorer who failed to check that weapon before handing it to Baldwin.
Responsibility also goes to whomever allowed live ammunition anywhere near that set. It got there somehow. I'm still waiting for the facts to come out on that.
As far as Baldwins legal responsibility as a producer, I frankly don't know. My guess would be a civil liability..but not criminal.
The criminal is the one who put live rounds in that gun, and/or, failed to check it one last time before handing it to Baldwin.
As many have said before, a perfect storm happened that day.
Edit. I still think Baldwin's a d-bag..but d-bags still have legal rights..and least for now.
Oh that. Show me where I accused you.Yeah, I'm pretty sure, based on this
That's the caliber not the gun used on a different dumb actor incident. What was the gun Baldwin had?
How about you show me where I accused you of accusing me?Oh that. Show me where I accused you.
Pretty clear I didn't suggest you were accusing ME, I just asked were you saw anyone making excusesDude . . why on God's green earth do you think anyone is making any excuses for him?!?!?!?
The debate here isn't if he should be held reasonable or not, or even if he's 'guilty' or not, the only disagreement is if the ACTUAL rules and laws in place make it more likely to hold him accountable in his role as the actor or as the producer.
Yeah, thats the same as a Colt action wise. No transfer bar and floating firing pin.45 Colt (.45 Long Colt) caliber F.lli Pietta single-action revolver, Model 1873 SA (Californian), Serial Number E52277
FBI Document Page 5
By floating, I assume you mean a firing pin mounted in the frame, but it is a hammer mounted firing pin in the gun Baldwin used.Yeah, thats the same as a Colt action wise. No transfer bar and floating firing pin.
The pins are called floating when they pivot on the hammer. Its a firing pin that can be changed without changing the entire hammer.By floating, I assume you mean a firing pin mounted in the frame, but it is a hammer mounted firing pin in the gun Baldwin used.
There it is in black and white:How about you show me where I accused you of accusing me?
For folks skipping pages, here is what I said
Pretty clear I didn't suggest you were accusing ME, I just asked were you saw anyone making excuses
Dude . . why on God's green earth do you think anyone is making any excuses for him?!?!?!?
...
I very much doubt anyone disagrees with that. The main points of contention seem to be how to get him there and what the roots of his moral and legal liability are (Hint; as the recent conviction of the armorer demonstrate they are most definitely different than if he had shot someone in his living room, accidentally or otherwise).Back on topic: Baldwin is a murderer and should rot in jail.