Mass shootings aren't more frequent _ but they are deadlier
While the story is still slanted to cast doubt against "the wide availability of firearms" in America, the "much-maligned "assault weapon" with its military style" and the infamous "AR-style firearm"........... they were at least more honest than usual when it comes to anything involving firearms.
Ray
*Emphasis mineABC [I]News[/I] said:It can sometimes seem as though mass shootings are occurring more frequently. Researchers who have been studying such crimes for decades say they aren't,...
/Snip/
While mass shootings happen with regularity, they still remain so rare* that there isn't enough information to draw conclusions with any certainty.
/Snip/
"Some years are worse than others, and bad years tend to be followed by not-so-bad years," Fox said. While two of the deadliest took place this year, "you can't take the actions of one or two people and call it a new phenomenon. That's abberational. You can't make any pattern or trend based on that."
/Snip/
In half of the deadliest mass shootings, the perpetrator used at least one AR-style firearm. In one, the massacre at a McDonald's in San Ysidro, California, in 1984, the shooter used an Uzi submachine gun. The others were carried out with handguns, the weapon used in the majority of mass shootings.*
"Contrary to what some folks may think, the incidence of mass public shootings has not increased since Sandy Hook or even the five years before that,*" Duwe said.
While the story is still slanted to cast doubt against "the wide availability of firearms" in America, the "much-maligned "assault weapon" with its military style" and the infamous "AR-style firearm"........... they were at least more honest than usual when it comes to anything involving firearms.
Ray