JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Status
Bootypr8......

"This is not going to solve every violent crime in this country. It's not going to prevent every mass shooting. It's not going to keep every gun out of the hands of a criminal." President Obama Jan. 2016

I'm not interested in "doing something" for the simple sake of claiming to have done something. I'm only interested in what actually works. I measure every new executive order or proposed piece of legislation against past history and ask "Would it have prevented _______ shooting?" So far the answer has been universally "no".

E
 
Someone's drinking the strong kool-aid or knows zero about the situation if you think this president is genuinely trying to reduce gun violence. The gun seller rule is existing law and blatant political posturing. The tweaking of the NFA rules are like the 7n6 ban and the attempted Ss109 ban. A thinly veiled attempt to harass gun owners since zero crimes are committed with NFA items and no cases have been cited of these projectiles being used against LE.

If you can't see that wherever the line in the sand is drawn, they will throw themselves on the floor like a spoiled child demanding you retreat and when you do they start the process over.

But I've got the feeling the OP is BS and we're talking to ourselves.
 
I read the last one was 1970. Not sure though. Were those instances illegal machine guns and not NFA items? Either way, the point is the same.

At one point the president noted concern over the apparent easy access to sawed-off shotguns and 'silencers'. Wow, this guy appears to get his 'facts' on gun crime from 70's and 80's TV shows. I'm willing to bet that he even believes that a suppressor on a gun actually makes it sound like they do in the movies. This guy is so far out of touch with reality it's sickening. And you're right, NFA items aren't the problem - and I think he does know that, which is why he goes after them in order to go after us.
 
To the OP. You are so wrong.. Please educate yourself a bit more on the entire subject. And no, the vast majority DOESNT support draconian laws because there is a TON of grey area that the law doesnt really cover and those that do are too extreme.

YOU may be fine losing your freedom one executive action at a time, but many others are not.
 
''For instance, consider Obama's legislation. He is using executive powers to push through laws that make background checks required for sellers (gun shows, etc), as well as modifying who qualifies as a "seller" so that people cannot get away with avoiding background checks without making legal repercussions much worse. He also is targeting the severe lack of funding that our Mental health system gets by providing much more cash flow going into vamping up that area of medicine and clinical treatment. Neither of those are hurting the right or ease of buying guns and owning guns, just adding a fast background check to the super minority of gun sales without checks and improving a mental health system that will aid in reducing our suicide rates (by targeting the stigma of "weakness" for getting help) and mental problems with citizens and military alike. Yet, there is a massive amount of resistance from the right side of the political spectrum for these measures currently.''

Really?

''Obamas legislation''? Doesn't that involve legislators?
Don't try and make it sound all fair and balanced. :s0140:

And he hasn't changed the definition of ''seller'' as you say.
Or made background checks required on all gun sales.
There is no federal need for all sellers to do anything.


US code 921

(21) The term "engaged in the business" means—

(C)
as applied to a dealer in firearms, as defined in section 921(a)(11)(A), a person who devotes time, attention, and labor to dealing in firearms as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the repetitive purchase and resale of firearms, but such term shall not include a person who makes occasional sales, exchanges, or purchases of firearms for the enhancement of a personal collection or for a hobby, or who sells all or part of his personal collection of firearms;

And as far as funding for mental health goes'?

Congress has the control over all funding. And they won't fund Obama's Executive order.
So really Obama didn't do anything. But maybe ''Push'' as you said in your post. :D

Sorry your Idol let you down. ;)
 
Obviously he is from "close enough" to Chicago to be yet another nutless Obama worshiping peasant that isn't bright enough to see the danger of over regulation and the path to a socialist America run by similar gonad challenged Dems and Progs. They are not man enough to dictate how I live my life or raise my children. I refuse to bow down to the control of those not worthy to hold my jock. Eunuchs blind to history and ignorant to the smell of tyranny baking in the ovens of evil. The type that couldn't last a month without Nanny state restrictions and hand outs. Like all the metrosexual non-men in Multnomah and King counties.
I grow tired of these weak willed sheep we are surrounded by. Have another latte and a scone ma'am and enjoy your trip back to Chicago. At least the Cubs are winners. Oh, wait, that's right...they're not either.
 
Why get all lengthy for the troll?

Simple fact of the matter is that ALL bubblegumming "left leaning" gun owners who don't vote for pro2A candidates are exactly the reason why gun rights are in continuous jeopardy in Oregon and Washington.

They're nothing short of freakin' enablers.
 
Dear Northwest Firearms Friends,

''I am from Illinois (not Chicago) where I am currently finishing my aircraft mechanic course and certification, which will be complete in two weeks. I have also been working on my residency in WA while in IL and will be in the Seattle area with my family to begin my job search upon completion of my training. I am so happy to be moving back to such a glorious state as Washington. I am a moderate, more left leaning gun owner and always will be one, and I do not understand the hostility when it comes to legal changes to laws regarding firearms to any extent''.



I think you discredited yourself nicely when you said ''I do not understand''. :D
 
Why so much hate?

The liberal game plan hasn't worked so they have turned to the death by a thousand cuts method. Just take a little at a time and nobody will notice. Well, some people have noticed.

This smells a whole lot like propaganda not so cleverly disguised as an intro.
 
I think it's a shame all members here couldn't respond to this person in an intelligent, respectful fashion, or stay out of it. When some of us look bad it reflects on all of us.

As usual etrain16, well written.
 
Dear thebootypir8

Thank you from coming here to "shed some light" on the President's actions. Your post reads like professionally written propaganda. It seems quite out of place given the way everyone else posts. A brand new user, here to support the President just days after his announcements.

Im curious if you are paid to make these posts? how well does he pay?
 
I think it's a shame all members here couldn't respond to this person in an intelligent, respectful fashion, or stay out of it. When some of us look bad it reflects on all of us.

As usual etrain16, well written.

Your right!
From now on You can do all my talking for me.

But is it OK with you Sir, If I keep my guns?
Wipe my butt?
Have my own F-ing opinion! ;)
 
To the OP, LOL told you you stepped in it. Here's the deal, if you are a troll go away, if your serious, find out what your country really is and how vital it is that you understand our Constitution. You seem young and you and all your friends need to understand this or you'll lose it. Good luck , whatever the case maybe.
25,000 + gun laws already on the books.
 
Last Edited:
Status

Upcoming Events

Teen Rifle 1 Class
Springfield, OR
Kids Firearm Safety 2 Class
Springfield, OR

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top