JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Just like the Controlled Substances Act put an end to meth cooking.
Your right - it didn't put and end to it - just made it illegal - but I hardly believe our reloading rights, or any gun related rights will ever be jeopardized. If so any threats would only serve to divide this country even more so than it already is. I believe any real, substantive threat to our gun rights would result in another 'splinter' political group, possibly up to 1/3 of our country, and we have enough of these already.
 
Scare tactics by people who want your money. Fact- any treaty must be affirmed by US Senate, rural America controls Senate. Will NEVER happen and it does not matter the party in the majority.

I believe that if a treaty is signed but not brought up to vote, it remains in effect until it is renounced by a president or voted upon in the senate...
 
I believe in pink unicorns... sorry, couldn't resist :p

Yes, we know........

Obummer14.jpg

I guess I just couldn't resist either.
 
I believe that if a treaty is signed but not brought up to vote, it remains in effect until it is renounced by a president or voted upon in the senate...

I believe in pink unicorns... sorry, couldn't resist :p

Gotta go with fd15k on this. Netsecsys, who would sign the treaty and how would they do it without the authority of a Congressional say so? How is it that a treaty could go into effect "until it is renounced by a president or voted upon in the senate"? Not trying to slam you personally, but good grief it's this kind of misinformed regurgitation of baloney that is either the genesis of fear mongering or just the propogation of the same. What happened to critical thinking skills?
 
The official word on treaties:

Senate must approve all multilateral treaties, and by two thirds.

Read this:

EXECUTIVE ORDERS ISSUED...
Teddy Roosevelt 3
Others to FDR NONE
FDR 11 in 16 years
Truman 5 in 7 years
Ike 2 in 8 years
Kennedy 4 in 3 years
LBJ 4 in 5 years
Nixon 1 in 6 years
Ford 3 in 2 years
Carter 3 in 4 years
Reagan 5 in 8 years
Bush 3 in 4 years
Clinton 15 in 8 years
George W. Bush 62 in 8 years
Obama 923 in 3 1/2 years ... Executive Orders .... where's the media? If you don't get the implications, you're not paying attention. How many warnings do you need? 923 Executive Orders in 40 Months. Don't you all think there's something wrong with this picture?

Now
look at these:

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 designates the of all persons. Postmaster General to operate a national registration

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be
abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued
over a fifteen year period.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in
times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to
establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and
distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also
provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months.


Feel free to verify (Google) the "executive orders" at will... and these are just the major ones .....
 
Read this:

EXECUTIVE ORDERS ISSUED...
Teddy Roosevelt 3
Others to FDR NONE
FDR 11 in 16 years
Truman 5 in 7 years
Ike 2 in 8 years
Kennedy 4 in 3 years
LBJ 4 in 5 years
Nixon 1 in 6 years
Ford 3 in 2 years
Carter 3 in 4 years
Reagan 5 in 8 years
Bush 3 in 4 years
Clinton 15 in 8 years
George W. Bush 62 in 8 years
Obama 923 in 3 1/2 years ... Executive Orders .... where's the media? If you don't get the implications, you're not paying attention. How many warnings do you need? 923 Executive Orders in 40 Months. Don't you all think there's something wrong with this picture?

Now
look at these:

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 designates the of all persons. Postmaster General to operate a national registration

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be
abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued
over a fifteen year period.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in
times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to
establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.

-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and
distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also
provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months.


Feel free to verify (Google) the "executive orders" at will... and these are just the major ones .....

Google came up with this :

snopes.com: President Obama's 923 Executive Orders
 
Gotta go with fd15k on this. Netsecsys, who would sign the treaty and how would they do it without the authority of a Congressional say so? How is it that a treaty could go into effect "until it is renounced by a president or voted upon in the senate"? Not trying to slam you personally, but good grief it's this kind of misinformed regurgitation of baloney that is either the genesis of fear mongering or just the propogation of the same. What happened to critical thinking skills?

From the US Senate website:
U.S. Senate: Art & History Home > Origins & Development > Powers & Procedures > Treaties

Process
When a treaty is submitted to the Senate for approval, the Senate has several options for action. The Senate may approve or reject the treaty as it has been submitted or it may make its approval conditional by including in the resolution amendments to the text of the treaty—reservations, understandings, interpretations, declarations, or other statements. The president and the other countries involved must then decide whether to accept the conditions and changes in the legislation, renegotiate the provisions, or abandon the treaty. Finally, the Senate may choose to take no definitive action, leaving the treaty pending in the Senate until withdrawn at the request of the president or, occasionally, at the initiative of the Senate.
 
An executive order cannot be used for treaty ratification. This needs Senate action, or inaction, it is Spelled out in Acrticle 2 of the US Constitution.
 
You think executive orders are scary, thats nothing compared to signing statements. Lets be clear, every politician of every stripe is drunk with "percieved" power.
 
From the US Senate website:
U.S. Senate: Art & History Home > Origins & Development > Powers & Procedures > Treaties

Process
When a treaty is submitted to the Senate for approval, the Senate has several options for action. The Senate may approve or reject the treaty as it has been submitted or it may make its approval conditional by including in the resolution amendments to the text of the treaty—reservations, understandings, interpretations, declarations, or other statements. The president and the other countries involved must then decide whether to accept the conditions and changes in the legislation, renegotiate the provisions, or abandon the treaty. Finally, the Senate may choose to take no definitive action, leaving the treaty pending in the Senate until withdrawn at the request of the president or, occasionally, at the initiative of the Senate.

And where does it talk about treaty going in effect (actually being implemented) without Senate's approval ?
 
So, what is the cause for attempting to ban the manufacture of Ammo? Just chipping away until they can get a foot hold to ban all guns?

Have there been a recent amount of accidental deaths from reloaded ammo? Because I am pretty sure that the people who go out and commit murder don't reload their own ammo.
 
It's sad to see so many folks on this forum willing to give up their rights..blinders eventually turn into hoods...

Nobody is advocating for giving up rights. Funny that someone is accussed of having blinders on when all they did is exercise some critical thinking skills that happen to run counter to the drivel that is World Net Daily.
 
So, what is the cause for attempting to ban the manufacture of Ammo? Just chipping away until they can get a foot hold to ban all guns?

Have there been a recent amount of accidental deaths from reloaded ammo? Because I am pretty sure that the people who go out and commit murder don't reload their own ammo.

Theoretically the point is to track all ammo sales to prevent boogies from getting any. Reloading components are mostly untrackable, and make it harder to control all ammo
distribution. Russia and Serbia come to mind - they sell a ton of reloading components here, they wouldn't want to lose this market.
 

Upcoming Events

Lakeview Spring Gun Show
Lakeview, OR
Albany Gun Show
Albany, OR
Falcon Gun Show - Classic Gun & Knife Show
Stanwood, WA
Wes Knodel Gun & Knife Show - Albany
Albany, OR

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top