Diamond Supporter
Platinum Lifetime
Platinum Supporter
Gold Lifetime
Silver Lifetime
Bronze Lifetime
- Messages
- 24,715
- Reactions
- 66,831
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then where would the carsgo?Is there a reason the Navy can't just fill a cargo freighter with vertical launchers to enable bombardment with over 100s of missiles?
With all the surplus super cargo freighters out there.. it just struck me as odd, because something like what I described would be the modern analogy to the old school anti sub warfare Naval trawlers employed by the Allied during WW2...Then where would the carsgo?
I was just reading something earlier this week (some might call this an example of the Simulation Hypothesis - but that's another discussion for a different time) describing the use of Q-ships during both World Wars by both sides to the conflicts. Q-ships were basically heavily-armed merchant steamers with concealed weaponry (much like these shipping container missile systems). The idea behind the Q-ship was to lure an opposing submarine to the surface to engage the (ostensibly merchant) Q-ship, thereby saving the sub's limited number of torpedoes and instead using its deck gun, whereupon the Q-ship would then drop the ruse de guerre and fire upon, and often sink, the unsuspecting submarine. The Q-ship fell out of favor following WWII, being considered against the Laws of War, and also the fact that later (nuclear-powered) submarines did not need to surface at all to attack surface ships.I mean.. the Russians have something like this already; the Club K missile system, a launcher that's inside a standard shipping container... and then the Danes have the Stanflex system View attachment 1424934View attachment 1424935
View attachment 1424936View attachment 1424937
The USN has the MK41 VLS; such a system could be ideal for filling what used to be the cargo/fish holds of a trawler or light freighter type of cargo ship
View attachment 1424938
Very similar concept that I'm presenting. Actually might be very useful against say... a certain nation trying to control the South China Sea...I was just reading something earlier this week (some might call this an example of the Simulation Hypothesis - but that's another discussion for a different time) describing the use of Q-ships during both World Wars by both sides to the conflicts. Q-ships were basically heavily-armed merchant steamers with concealed weaponry (much like these shipping container missile systems). The idea behind the Q-ship was to lure an opposing submarine to the surface to engage the (ostensibly merchant) Q-ship, thereby saving the sub's limited number of torpedoes and instead using its deck gun, whereupon the Q-ship would then drop the ruse de guerre and fire upon, and often sink, the unsuspecting submarine. The Q-ship fell out of favor following WWII, being considered against the Laws of War, and also the fact that later (nuclear-powered) submarines did not need to surface at all to attack surface ships.
Pretty sure that could result in an escalation of hostilities that no one wants...Very similar concept that I'm presenting. Actually might be very useful against say... a certain nation trying to control the South China Sea...
At which point, a certain nation trying to control the South China Sea would just "open up" on any (and possibly every) cargo vessel in the area.Edit. Try picking out the one cargo ship full of such missiles like the Club K from the rest of the cargo ships traversing South China Sea...
Coulda been worse. Such as: