JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
This, a great bit of information from Gunfixx.
--------------------------

Grant Duwe, Minnesota Department of Corrections.
Highest was in 1920’s.
Incidents of mass murder in the U.S. declined from 42 in the 1990s to 26 in the first decade of this century. The chances of being killed in a mass shooting are about what they are for being struck by lightning. Until the Newtown horror, the three worst K–12 school shootings ever had taken place in Britain and Germany.
Gun control in a country that already has 200 million privately owned firearms is likely to do little to keep weapons out of the hands of criminals. A more legitimate debate would be on the two taboo subjects — the laws that make it difficult to control people with mental illness and the growing body of evidence that “gun-free” zones, which ban the carrying of firearms by law-abiding individuals, don’t work.

From Mother Jones-
Mother Jones magazine found that at least 38 of the 61 mass shooters in the past three decades “displayed signs of mental health problems prior to the killings.” New York Times columnist David Brooks and Cornell Law School professor William Jacobson have both suggested that the ACLU-inspired laws that make it so difficult to intervene and identify potentially dangerous people should be loosened. “Will we address mental-health and educational-privacy laws, which instill fear of legal liability for reporting potentially violent mentally ill people to law enforcement?” asks Professor Jacobson. “I doubt it.”

Economists John Lott and William Landes conducted a groundbreaking study in 1999, and found that a common theme of mass shootings is that they occur in places where guns are banned and killers know everyone will be unarmed, such as shopping malls and schools.

Lott offers a final damning statistic:
“With just one single exception, the attack on congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson in 2011, every public shooting since at least 1950 in the U.S. in which more than three people have been killed has taken place where citizens are not allowed to carry guns.
 
A Video that will truly wake American people up.
It is only the controlling tyranny loving politicians that
are pushing gun control. They pull the sheeple behind
them that really DO NOT UNDERSTAND.
PLEASE WATCH THIS VIDEO AND THEN THINK LONG AND HARD.


This one gives the administration a migraine.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hysteria is used to control people by unfounded lies and propaganda by the unscrupulous leftists
that have invaded our country's political system.

<broken link removed>

AGAIN:
Mass Shootings Are Responsible For Less Than 100 Out of 12,000 Annual Homicides in the US

By Matt MacBradaigh January 12, 2013

Mass Shootings Are Responsible For Less Than 100 Out of 12,000 Annual Homicides in the US

Massive media publicity over mass shootings in the last year have brought gun control back to the forefront
in the U.S. Banning so-called "assault weapons" and "high capacity" magazines are all the rage.
Calls have been made for an honest national dialogue that puts every option on the table.

An honest conversation ought to look at as complete of a picture as possible so we can correctly assess "just how big of an issue is it?"

To adequately evaluate this question, we should examine how many homicides there are in the U.S. overall,
compared to homicides from firearms (handguns, rifles, shotguns), compared to homicides from rifles only
(in which so-called "assault rifles" would fall), and homicides that occur in mass shootings. We ought to further
compare homicides to other causes of death to get a comparative indication of the magnitude of each compared
to other public health risks that cause death in the U.S. This will help us understand the relative significance of the issue.

Total U.S. homicides: The total number of homicides in the U.S., reported by the FBI, is about 12,000-13,000 annually.
Generally, this has trended downward since the early 1990s and 1980s, which saw several years with homicides ranging
from 21,000-24,000 homicides. In 2010, the last year available, the number was 12,996. In 2009, it was 13,752.

Firearm homicides: Out of the total homicides, about 2/3 are committed with firearms, 1/3 from other causes.
We'll look at both. In 2010, firearm homicides were 8,775, or 67.5% of all homicides. In 2009, the number was 9,199, or 66.8% of all homicides.

Rifle homicides: The FBI reports the total number of rifle homicides is about 350 annually the last couple of years.
This includes bolt-action rifles, as well as semi-automatic rifles and so-called "assault rifles.
There is a separate category for shotguns, so they are not included in this number. In 2010, the number of rifle homicides was
358, or 2.75% of all homicides. In 2009, the number was 351, or 2.55% of all homicides.

Mass shooting homicides: Pop-media classification of "mass murder" varies. For instance, CNN's Piers Morgan (radical spinmeister)
and The Nation cite shootings in which only 1 or 2 homicides occur. However, the FBI defines mass murder as 4 or more killed.

In 2012, there were either 81 or 88 murdered in mass shootings, depending on your source. Less than 100 no matter,
which source, is used. So if we assume high at 100 homicides from mass murder and assume low at 12,000 annual
homicides that means that mass murders account for 0.0083 of all homicides, or a fraction of 1%.

Personal weapon homicides: FBI data shows that "personal" weapon homicides, which is defined by hands/feet (beating someone
to death) are 7-800 annually. In 2010, it was 745; in 2009, 817. This is more than double all rifle homicides. It is more than 7 or 8
times the number of mass murder homicides.

Compared to other causes of death — public health & safety issues:

Motor vehicle deaths: There are between 32-42,000 deaths from vehicle collisions every year. This dwarfs both homicides firearm
homicides easily. When compared just to rifle homicides at ~ 350, motor vehicle deaths is massive & rifle homicides is minuscule.

Unintentional injury deaths: The Center for Disease Control (CDC) reported 118,021 accidental deaths in 2009, the last year reported.
Compared to this mass murder again appears relatively insignificant in terms of loss of life and public health concern.

Accidental fall deaths: 2009 saw 24,792 accidental fall deaths. This accounts for 247 times the number of mass murder deaths.

Others reported by CDC:

Drug-induced deaths - 39,147
Alcohol-induced deaths - 24,518
Accidental poisoning - 31,758

Choking: There are approximately 4,600 choking deaths every year. That's 46 times the number of mass murder deaths.
Children's choking deaths number 1825, or more than 18 times the total number of mass murder deaths.

Bambi: According to the Insurance Journal, 200 people were killed by hitting deer with their cars.
That's more than double the number of mass murder deaths.

These cited statistics provide a mountain of data from credible sources that clearly provides a good comparison by which we
can evaluate mass murder homicides within a complete picture of U.S. homicides as well as provide a means to compare
homicides and mass murder to other causes of death that affect public health and safety concerns.

When you evaluate the broader picture of public health causes of death, and even within homicides as its own category, mass murder looks pretty insignificant.
 
Please read the 10 things to do in 2014 if you want to fight for your 2nd Amendment rights

Ten things to do and watch for in 2014 - Seattle gun rights | Examiner.com

<broken link removed>
.
.
 
A Video that will truly wake American people up.
It is only the controlling tyranny loving politicians that
are pushing gun control. They pull the sheeple behind
them that really DO NOT UNDERSTAND.
PLEASE WATCH THIS VIDEO AND THEN THINK LONG AND HARD.


This one gives the administration a migraine.

Migraine hell... this is a concussion :s0140:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A BETTER TIME TO ACT

NOW is the time to Join if you are not already a member.
Your membership builds strength into the fight to defeat the
Anti Gun Hysteria that plagues our Nation.
If you are a member, buy your friends and family a membership.
Click here and sign up.
NRA Online Membership
 
Huge majority of police are against gun control.

PoliceOne's Gun Control Survey: 11 key lessons from officers' perspectives

Bottom Line Conclusions Quite clearly, the majority of officers polled oppose the theories brought forth by gun-control advocates who claim that proposed restrictions on weapon capabilities and production would reduce crime.

In fact, many officers responding to this survey seem to feel that those controls will negatively affect their ability to fight violent criminals.

Contrary to what the mainstream media and certain politicians would have us believe, police overwhelmingly favor an armed citizenry, would like to see more guns in the hands of responsible people, and are skeptical of any greater restrictions placed on gun purchase, ownership, or accessibility.

The officers patrolling America&rsquo;s streets have a deeply-vested interest

, their voice has been heard.
 
One thing that is abundantly clear is that while the prohibitionists goals have remained the same, their choice of words has changed in an attempt to make their nonsensical ideas sound palatable. Dave Workman has a couple of excellent articles covering this issue, <broken link removed>and <broken link removed>. A clear case of this is the use of the phrase 'gun safety'. We understand what this rightly means. Your attitudes and practices as you handle firearms. What the prohibitionists mean when they say 'gun safety' is entirely different. They mean laws, regulations and people control. Excellent examples of their attempts at newspeak are linked in Dave's articles and here and here.

It is critical for us to counter any of their attempts at subterfuge whenever they use their new jargon and call them on their b.s.
 
Facts, reason, and critical thinking should be cornerstones in dealing with the issue of Rights. It will not sway any diehard prohibitionist stance, but people on the fence might see reason. Those close to the fence might not give weight to such arguments thought. Sometimes another direction is warranted. Prohibitionists all too often take their arguments to emotional extremes and unfortunately too many people listen. This man shows an excellent example of popping some bubbles. I doubt he will change any council member's mind, but some of those listening might be jarred enough to actually start thinking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixhsuB6xMR8
 
Looking for activists across the northwest to take part in several direct actions. This goes far beyond contacting politicians or giving money to a group. This involves edgy tactics and outside-the-box thinking. Please PM me if you are interested.
 
Awesome discussion great info. On How to get connected do ones part

It all was not really placed here as a discussion area, More as a resource to connect with the pro gun groups of your choosing and an information source on related issues. Just thought it would be nice to have in one easy to find area.
 

Upcoming Events

Centralia Gun Show
Centralia, WA
Klamath Falls gun show
Klamath Falls, OR
Oregon Arms Collectors April 2024 Gun Show
Portland, OR
Albany Gun Show
Albany, OR

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top