- Messages
- 6,779
- Reactions
- 1,275
I understand that Trismn.
But somebody here needs to point out his delusions :nuts: and lies to the general reader.
How am I doin'?
"You had me at Buggy is delusional"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I understand that Trismn.
But somebody here needs to point out his delusions :nuts: and lies to the general reader.
How am I doin'?
Guess what George Bush is not in control of this country so it doesn't matter if George Bush is Jesus Christ or Satan himself as he has no power and cannot change anything at this point.
Excellent point as usual,...
But that doesn't "feed the need" to perpetuate their BDS. <-- Bush Derangement Syndrome!
"Don't Tread On Me":
Look at the health scam that was passed. 65%+/- a few do NOT approve. This is elected officials running their own course. That's what we're standing up against. Our elected officials not doing what their constituents want. That my friend (whether your a lib, conservative, democrat or repub) is the reason I stand up for my country.
This argument about the health care debate never sat right with me. It is a well known fact that the distribution of wealth is skewed, a small percent of the population control a large portion of the wealth. The health care bill was designed is to help the less fortunate(much greater portion) of the nation, to me this is democracy in action, we elected Obama, we wanted this bill to pass. I can see why some people are unhappy about it, but claiming that is not representative of what the (majority of the)people want is wrong. Why would the they be against something that clearly benefits them?
This argument about the health care debate never sat right with me. It is a well known fact that the distribution of wealth is skewed, a small percent of the population control a large portion of the wealth. The health care bill was designed is to help the less fortunate(much greater portion) of the nation, to me this is democracy in action, we elected Obama, we wanted this bill to pass. I can see why some people are unhappy about it, but claiming that is not representative of what the (majority of the)people want is wrong. Why would the they be against something that clearly benefits them?
This argument about the health care debate never sat right with me. ....................
obama, bush, lib, con....whats the freekin diff?...warrentlass wiretaps.....wars (1started 1 continues). Repus spend like drunken sailors, the Dems spend like drunken sailors.....meet the new boss same as the old boss...
I hope you guys see what Bugeye is doing. He is taking the topic of the original post and diverting it and making you guys spend your time defending your politics and while ignoring the original topic which he wants to divert attention from.
Don't fall for it just brush past his posts and go back to the original topic. Trying to change his mind or show him logic is futile.
Original topic:
"What happened at the Tea party"
Bugeye divert topic:
Bush bad, Bush bad, Bush bad.................................
Guess what George Bush is not in control of this country so it doesn't matter if George Bush is Jesus Christ or Satan himself as he has no power and cannot change anything at this point.
This argument about the health care debate never sat right with me. It is a well known fact that the distribution of wealth is skewed, a small percent of the population control a large portion of the wealth. The health care bill was designed is to help the less fortunate(much greater portion) of the nation, to me this is democracy in action, we elected Obama, we wanted this bill to pass. I can see why some people are unhappy about it, but claiming that is not representative of what the (majority of the)people want is wrong. Why would the they be against something that clearly benefits them?
This argument about the health care debate never sat right with me. It is a well known fact that the distribution of wealth is skewed, a small percent of the population control a large portion of the wealth. The health care bill was designed is to help the less fortunate(much greater portion) of the nation, to me this is democracy in action, we elected Obama, we wanted this bill to pass. I can see why some people are unhappy about it, but claiming that is not representative of what the (majority of the)people want is wrong. Why would the they be against something that clearly benefits them?
There is someone who gets it!
The correct answer on who better serves us? None of the above!
People are letting themselves be divided into Left vs Right when it should be People vs Left and Right.
This argument about the health care debate never sat right with me. It is a well known fact that the distribution of wealth is skewed, a small percent of the population control a large portion of the wealth. The health care bill was designed is to help the less fortunate(much greater portion) of the nation, to me this is democracy in action, we elected Obama, we wanted this bill to pass. I can see why some people are unhappy about it, but claiming that is not representative of what the (majority of the)people want is wrong. Why would the they be against something that clearly benefits them?