Silver Vendor
- Messages
- 2,893
- Reactions
- 7,955
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Total side note - how is "iFiberone" not being sued by General Mills for trademark infringement? Their Fiber One bars have no doubt been around longer, and are more useful than any modern "news" source.
Back on topicish - do any Washington LEOs wish to chime in with their view and how they'll handle the new anti-2A laws?
Do you have 5 million to buy the iniative process?You know......
Sheeple can be easily lead. So, the LEFT intentionally used the words, "Assault Rifle" to sway votes. I'd bet, that many were swayed by the mere mention of the words. Ask most any voter today (only days after the election) if they can give you a legal definition of an "assault rifle". The results would probably lead you to conclude, that people don't actually READ this stuff. Thus, legislation by initiative is probably just a BAD IDEA.
But.....
We could also use the initiative process to win back our rights. Perhaps, if we titled our proposal as, "FREEDOM & PERSONAL DEFENSE ACT". Then proceed to repeal the stupid laws that have recently been enacted?
Aloha, Mark
Do you have 5 million to buy the iniative process?
Do you have 5 million to buy the iniative process?
No $5 million.
But, I am giving some thought, to moving. The biggest problem at this point is.....the GF.
Aloha, Mark
I moved once already. They just keep coming. I don't have 5 million either. But I got a few thousand rounds of ammo, and body armor, along with a voice, a vote, and the ability to canvass and drum up Pro 2A voters, along with the time to take new people shooting.
All key to our survival. But tactical retreating doesn't win wars.
As for the other "provocative" words? About what I own (implying perhaps use)?
Perhaps, it's just better to say less
^This ^You know......
Sheeple can be easily lead. So, the LEFT intentionally used the words, "Assault Rifle" to sway votes. I'd bet, that many were swayed by the mere mention of the words. Ask most any voter today (only days after the election) if they can give you a legal definition of an "assault rifle". The results would probably lead you to conclude, that people don't actually READ this stuff. Thus, legislation by initiative is probably just a BAD IDEA.
But.....
We could also use the initiative process to win back our rights. Perhaps, if we titled our proposal as, "FREEDOM & PERSONAL DEFENSE ACT". Then proceed to repeal the stupid laws that have recently been enacted? Rrrright.....who would vote against FREEDOM or PERSONAL DEFENSE?
Aloha, Mark