Climate Change Skepticism a Sickness That Must be Treated, Says Professor Global warming alarmist equates climate denial with racism by Paul Joseph Watson Friday, March 30, 2012 Comparing skepticism of man-made global warming to racist beliefs, an Oregon-based professor of sociology and environmental studies has labeled doubts about anthropogenic climate change a sickness for which individuals need to be treated. Professor Kari Norgaard, who is currently appearing at the Planet Under Pressure conference in London, has presented a paper in which she argues that cultural resistance to accepting the premise that humans are responsible for climate change must be recognized and treated as an aberrant sociological behavior. Norgaard equates skepticism of climate change alarmists whose data is continually proven to be politicized, agenda driven and downright inaccurate with racism, noting that overcoming such viewpoints poses a similar challenge to racism or slavery in the U.S. South. Professor Norgaard considers that fuzzy-studies academics such as herself must stand shoulder to shoulder with the actual real climate scientists who know some maths in an effort to change society and individuals for their own good. Its not a new idea: trick-cyclists in Blighty and the US have lately called for a science of communicating science rather reminiscent of Isaac Asimovs science-fictional Psychohistory discipline, able to predict and alter the behaviour of large populations, reports the Register. As Jurriaan Maessen documented yesterday, the Planet Under Pressure confab at which Norgaard is appearing to push this insane drivel is nothing other than a strategy session for neo-eugenicists to hone their population control agenda. A statement put out by the scientists behind the event calls for humans to be packed into denser cities (eco-gulags?) so that the rest of the planet can be surrendered to mother nature. Its a similar idea to the nightmare Planned-Opolis proposal put out by the Forum for the Future organization last year, in which human activity will be tightly regulated by a dictatorial technocracy in the name of saving the planet. The mindset of this gaggle of arrogant, scoffing elitists in their drive to micro-manage the human race, which they regard as a plague on the earth, is best encapsulated by the following quote from Planet Under Pressure attendee and Yale University professor Karen Seto. We certainly dont want them (humans) strolling about the entire countryside. We want them to save land for nature by living closely [together], Seto told MSNBC. The effort to re-brand legitimate scientific dissent as a mental disorder that requires pharmacological or psychological treatment is a frightening glimpse into the Brave New World society climate change alarmists see themselves as ruling over. Due to the fact that skepticism towards man-made global warming is running at an all time high, and with good reason, rather than admit they have lost the debate, climate change alarmists are instead advocating that their ideological opponents simply be drugged or brainwashed into compliance. Norgaards effort to equate climate skepticism with racism as a disorder that requires treatment also serves as a reminder of the story we covered earlier this month about the establishments efforts to push the pharmaceutical heart drug Propranolol as a cure for racist thoughts.