It's in HB3075 to ""fix"" Measure 114. Meaning if passed, it'll change some of the language of M114Isn't that kind of what it already said? Or did they move that language over from 3075 to 114? I don't see how they can prosecute ANYTHING while under injunction. Bravo to them for being so apt to notice their hands are tied.
In their minds, gun owners are going to be lining up for blocks to accept the absolute blessing that they've given us to redeem ourselves with society. And then we'll thank them for being so kind to us as to let us set ourselves straight with the Oregon State government. They might even expect we'll want to take them out for a nice dinner after we've cleared our names. Wow.
Delusions of grandeur, the lot of them. Not just the ones writing, but the ones who allowed them to vote it in by being present instead of preventing quorum
Okay, take for an example where no other crime is committed and no self-defense shooting. I'm just at a range day and I slip up somehow. (Yes this is unlikely but we have to rationalize every possible outcome to know how this works I guess)
I have doubts that it'll work that way. For one; I do believe at the range is explicitly stated as one of the exceptions/affirmative defenses for possessing large capacity magazines? Along with being on private property under your control (your home, your property)?
That's what WA did. Possession is not a crime. They are grandfathered. You can still carry it in your gun. Posses it wherever etc.
Yep, the very minute you've purchased your first gun (only if with greater than 10 round mags) you've become a violent minded individual, you just haven't committed the crime YET. Isn't that what Minority Report was about?
And here I thought they all read out of the same stupid playbook. Trump and Bondi can get started whenever they want.
A lot of people shoot in the BLM forested areas. Can we imagine every gun owner in the State of Oregon trying to go the relatively few sanctioned ranges that allow rifle shooting, etc? That would be wild.
ARPC ought to offer 75% discounts for memberships or at least offer actual workable range days that's not during workweeks for non-member gun owners to shoot their rifles.....
Taco Bell…vs. a McDonald's fart. Just making fries.It looks like, if you're "caught" with one and you voluntarily surrender it, this acts as an affirmative defense. I trust that about as much as a Taco Bell fart.
Bondi is pro red flag. Don't expect much.
And there's still the next Presidential election, of which things most certainly could go completely the other way against 2A.... Not to mention midterm elections in which the House and Senate may well flip back to D majorities, depending on how pissed off the voters are
Not gunna happen. lol.And there's still the next Presidential election, of which things most certainly could go completely the other way against 2A.... Not to mention midterm elections in which the House and Senate may well flip back to D majorities, depending on how pissed off the voters are
So really, we cannot rely on the Supreme Court, nor the Federal DOJ to do the right things until Congress gets turned upside down and changed out for people who are actually pro Constitution... However long that takes .
Which parts?
I wasn't particularly impressed with Trump's 1st term in 2A regards either but they've vocalized that they're going to start moving on it this time. I think he's still got a bone to pick against the left and he probably sees this as an opportunity to stick it to them
Words are nothing if they don't turn into action.
I'll believe it when I see it until then his track record is ban bump-stocks and take the guns first due process later.
