Yep that's right I read that part wrong. So really not confusing at all.
Let's assume the Oregon Supreme Court decides to review the case and continues the hold on implementation of M114. Let's also assume that HB3075 passes and is signed into law before M114 is implemented. This is where confusion comes with handling of 11+ mags. As you suggested earlier the court would have to do something to be sure HB3075 was also put on hold. Would they?
Not me. I escaped California, avoiding Gavin Newsom, knowing that Oregon had Some Of Its Own Problems.
Yup. Running fixes nothing.
How about walking?
That is correct it doesn't fix anything other than letting a bunch of ungrateful a$$ holes win. There comes a time when one shall stand to fight and ones that shall run.
Fixes nothing but at a slower rate.
As long as I'm contributing to their tax burdens, my voice won't be silenced. I can be a royal pain in anyone's @$$ if pushed far enough. They want me to go away, my tax dollars go with me...end of story.
As far as I understand, 114 technically went into play back when it "passed" but the enforcement of it has been on hold due to a restraining order due to the injunction. Therefore, anyone who bought magazines since then (or were acquired with a gun purchase), technically will be breaking an already existing law. It's such a bunch of BS, I don't think I've ever seen a law so Fd up in how it spells out.
Me too eventually. Not even just over this but because they want to make the state as unlivable as possible. Keep raising taxes, more woke classrooms with the lowest rated education in the country, not enforcing actual criminal punishment, homeless problems being pushed to our doorsteps, etc. Just keeps getting worse. It only seems normal in the bubble we create for ourselves here. With that said, NWFA has always given me a glimmer of hope where I couldn't seem to find it elsewhere and I thank you all for that.
Technically, only people who do not destroy their magazines once the law goes into affect would be breaking the law.
Yeah see there it is. We don't know what to believe because it's such a mess. I've heard the law was already in effect but the injunction stopped enforcement. But then that means they allowed gun shops to legally sell (transfer) illegal items. Makes no sense. I can only hope they'll enforce this law as well as they enforce real crimes in Oregon, then we'd be in the clear. But I'm sure they'll work a lot harder on us.
Come on guys, we've been through this about a hundred times.
Why would the courts address a bill that is not yet law? Besides, the courts have nothing to do with it until and unless someone brings a lawsuit.
And they ain't gonna stop until either thing happens
With the large exodus of their tax base from places like California and NY, the crazy didn't stop but it is harder to finance. Even Newsome has pretended to talk rational in public. Ok, he's outright lied about not saying somethings.
You don't have to destroy them but you can't use them outside of your house, a shooting range (how dispersed shooting is affected I don't know), or in an organized competition.
Look at Tony;s post on the preceding page. I also thought that there was some language that doesn't make people criminals if they bought a mag after December 0f2022.
